@ Merlin :
Thanks for your encouragement.
I think GF's eastern strategy is possible because of the move of the capital to New-York. And this is a problem of the game : historically, the political cost of such a change would have been huge and the penalty in the game is not sufficient (it is too easy to recover from the loss of NM).
@ Havi :
Thanks for the chearing, GF strategy is really challenging.
To stop a 9000 stack, I don't need to have as much forces as I am taking advantage of the defensive position and I will use MSG to concentrate my troops (Lee and Jackson are very powerful at this strategy) : I think you can't expect to win a battle if you don't have at least a 1.5 to 1 advantage, 2 to 1 if your opponent is entrenched.
However, the move of Grayfox has forced me to move my corps out of my prepared position so I won't be able to take advantage of the entrenchment before a few turns. So, yes, next turn could be challenging and put me in a bad position. Let's hope most of his corps will be inactive
Indeed, City Point is a weak point and I was already thinking to it yesterday evening. By moving some forces out of James City, GrayFox allows me to take a division from Beauregard's army and I have another division available.
One of the weakness of the South is the lack of 2* leaders which is a limit to the number of corps you can create.
Yes, shear number will crush the South at the end. But this is true with or without eastern strategy. What is important is to stretch the Confederate defenses with landings and coordinate them with your offensives in Virginia or in the Mississippi/Kentucky/Tennessee area.