Bullman
Lieutenant
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:35 am

Merchants/Tradepost decision change with patch?

Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:56 am

Hi

Just noticed that after the patch the Decision "Merchants" and "Tradepost" now can NOT be placed in a region you own!!!???
It now says "Must target a region you do not own".

Is this intended? It is the opposite to what it used to be.

pantsukki
Brigadier General
Posts: 483
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:38 pm

Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:15 pm

Bullman wrote:Hi

Just noticed that after the patch the Decision "Merchants" and "Tradepost" now can NOT be placed in a region you own!!!???
It now says "Must target a region you do not own".

Is this intended? It is the opposite to what it used to be.


They used to be possible only in foreign regions before too?

User avatar
Jim-NC
Posts: 2981
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Location: Near Region 209, North Carolina

Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:39 pm

the rules for a lot of the decisions changed going from 1.00 to 1.01. Among them that merchants are now placed in areas you don't control. Many decisions that were free now cost something to play as well.
Remember - The beatings will continue until morale improves.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Bullman
Lieutenant
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:35 am

Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:11 am

Jim-NC wrote:the rules for a lot of the decisions changed going from 1.00 to 1.01. Among them that merchants are now placed in areas you don't control. Many decisions that were free now cost something to play as well.


OK, but was it even a deliberate change? Even so, if some rules for decisions did deliberately change (I'm not so sure about that as this is not even mentioned in the patch change log however), what is the thinking behind an action that does not really make any real sense both in game sense and real world sense?

Why can players only add merchants/tradeposts to ENEMY areas and why would they want to? For a start, it would give the enemy income bonuses, and secondly in the real world, what is this even simulating? How could you even be allowed to do anything within enemy controlled areas like setting up "commerce"? Surely it's something you could only and would only want to do within one of your own regions.

Totally confused with what the thinking here is. :blink:

User avatar
Bohémond
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:47 pm

Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:21 am

The Decisions rules changes are deliberate.

Merchant and Tradepost decisions are a simulation of foreign trade. Not owned regions are not always enemy region.

Playing merchant decisions means taking a risk for player. He can earn money but his merchant structure can be destroyed any time.


Regards
Marco, perché vai così forte in salita?» «Per abbreviare la mia agonia.

Bullman
Lieutenant
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:35 am

Sun Dec 23, 2012 3:16 am

Bohémond wrote:The Decisions rules changes are deliberate.

Merchant and Tradepost decisions are a simulation of foreign trade. Not owned regions are not always enemy region.

Playing merchant decisions means taking a risk for player. He can earn money but his merchant structure can be destroyed any time.


I think the thinking behind this new undocumented rule change needs to be explained more.

So the game lets a player to "plant"/"construct" merchants/tradeposts in OTHER regions, but not their own, even if that region is enemy owned??
And these merchants/tradeposts are then supposed to give an advantage to the player as far as generating more denarii?

Realistically, what does it mean to make merchants/tradeposts in enemy regions and for them to then be beneficial to the player?

Why would an enemy region even allow you to even do that? :blink:

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:50 am

That's not the exact right way to look at that. Tradeposts can give you profits if you trade in foreign land, so not your own. The best strategy is to plant them in neutral territories, but you can also take the risk of establishing one in an hostile one, that's just not the optimal strategy. Also, don't think in a too modern way. You can establish a Roman tradepost to get money from Gauls wine for example, in a region where these people might be hostile. But there is no centralized Gauls government that will immediately send troops to burn the tradepost... That's just that it may happen that a Gallic tribe can kill the merchants, but perhaps not.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

Bullman
Lieutenant
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:35 am

Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:43 am

Pocus wrote:That's not the exact right way to look at that. Tradeposts can give you profits if you trade in foreign land, so not your own. The best strategy is to plant them in neutral territories, but you can also take the risk of establishing one in an hostile one, that's just not the optimal strategy. Also, don't think in a too modern way. You can establish a Roman tradepost to get money from Gauls wine for example, in a region where these people might be hostile. But there is no centralized Gauls government that will immediately send troops to burn the tradepost... That's just that it may happen that a Gallic tribe can kill the merchants, but perhaps not.


Ah! I have just zoomed out of the map I am playing and can now see all the possibilities for where I can place Merchants/Tradeposts. Despite reading the details/constraints on their placement, I was not expecting to be able to place them in regions in FOW (I was just looking at regions local to my own). I see now as Sertotians in "The Great Mithridatic War" that I an place Merchants/Tradeposts in lands as far away as the Pontic regions.

Does the AI place Merchants/Tradeposts as well? You mention they can be destroyed by "enemies". How is this done? Would a player have a particular option to do so if an enemy nation (AI or PBEM) placed merchants/tradepost in one of their own regions or is it automatic if a unit enters the region?

You talk about "neutral" territories. When you mouse over a unit, it tells you their standing. If you don't see any unit (because of FOW), is there a way to view their standing?

User avatar
Bohémond
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:47 pm

Thu Dec 27, 2012 1:00 pm

Bullman wrote:Ah! I have just zoomed out of the map I am playing and can now see all the possibilities for where I can place Merchants/Tradeposts. Despite reading the details/constraints on their placement, I was not expecting to be able to place them in regions in FOW (I was just looking at regions local to my own). I see now as Sertotians in "The Great Mithridatic War" that I an place Merchants/Tradeposts in lands as far away as the Pontic regions.

Does the AI place Merchants/Tradeposts as well? You mention they can be destroyed by "enemies". How is this done? Would a player have a particular option to do so if an enemy nation (AI or PBEM) placed merchants/tradepost in one of their own regions or is it automatic if a unit enters the region?

You talk about "neutral" territories. When you mouse over a unit, it tells you their standing. If you don't see any unit (because of FOW), is there a way to view their standing?


About Neutrals territories, if you click on the first filter icon (Minimap), you will see the map colored with Faction colors. The factions you are not at war with are neutral.

Regards
Marco, perché vai così forte in salita?» «Per abbreviare la mia agonia.

Bullman
Lieutenant
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:35 am

Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:35 am

Bohémond wrote:About Neutrals territories, if you click on the first filter icon (Minimap), you will see the map colored with Faction colors. The factions you are not at war with are neutral.


That was simple. Thanks!

Bullman
Lieutenant
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:35 am

Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:38 am

pantsukki wrote:They used to be possible only in foreign regions before too?


No, only in your own regions.

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:15 pm

I've just realised after spending 25 VP that the cost for Tradeposts has changed! I had to revert to a previous turn. It would be nice to see some mention in patch notes if decision costs or benefits change as many players must get an understanding of these and then never check them again (but I may have missed patch notes on these changes?)

Cheers,
Chris

barkmann44
Private
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 2:41 pm

Sun Jan 27, 2013 7:35 pm

Caeser supposedly possessed a map drawn up from the reports of merchants that had traded all over gaul and even brittania
long before the roman military ventured there.

Return to “Alea Jacta Est”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests