Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:25 pm
If measured solely in returns of general and war supplies and ammo on ones industrialization investment, then I would agree that investment may not be necessary for the Union.
But, many on the forum have discussed industrialization in certain states to increase availability of and distribution of general supplies and ammo to critical theaters, particularly the West. Barksdale recently wrote that investing out west can be cheaper than building some depots.
If viewed in those terms, which I do, then I find industrialization in MO, KS, IL and KY a good investment up to a certain point. But it bears the risk of capital improvements falling into your opponent's hands - but that's war for you.
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus