User avatar
DaemoneIsos
Sergeant
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:07 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Question on Industrializing

Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:16 am

Is there any way to invest in industrializing New England? Or California? (I can't seem to highlight them on the Economics screen.)

Thanks, -D
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
soloswolf
General of the Army
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:48 am

The good fighting men of NE are all you need! :D

(No, you can't select them ;) )
My name is Aaron.

Knight of New Hampshire

kwhitehead
Sergeant
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:26 am

Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:22 pm

I have only done limited testing but so far it doesn't look like there is any reason to invest in industrialization other than Railroads and River Transport for either the North or the South. My few tests show very little return to make up for the per turn costs of these. So far my attempts have had overall negative returns (the per cost was never matched by any significant increase in production).

User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:25 pm

If measured solely in returns of general and war supplies and ammo on ones industrialization investment, then I would agree that investment may not be necessary for the Union.

But, many on the forum have discussed industrialization in certain states to increase availability of and distribution of general supplies and ammo to critical theaters, particularly the West. Barksdale recently wrote that investing out west can be cheaper than building some depots.

If viewed in those terms, which I do, then I find industrialization in MO, KS, IL and KY a good investment up to a certain point. But it bears the risk of capital improvements falling into your opponent's hands - but that's war for you.
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus

User avatar
Jim-NC
Posts: 2981
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Location: Near Region 209, North Carolina

Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:18 pm

For a previous discussion industrialization and it's merits/demerits, see the link below
http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?t=14540&highlight=industrialization
Remember - The beatings will continue until morale improves.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
W.Barksdale
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 916
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:17 pm
Location: UK

Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:15 pm

Industrializing, as the Federals, can be advantage in certain regions. Just to be clear you will still need depots, however, you may not need as many.
"Tell General Lee that if he wants a bridge of dead Yankees I can furnish him with one."
-General William Barksdale at Fredericksburg

enf91
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:25 pm

Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:13 pm

Five replies and only 1 person actually answered your question. Still better than getting a response from a politician (please tell me there are none of you guys on this forum). No, you can't industrialize California, New England, or any other of the OMBs. A game engine or database limitation, I suppose.

User avatar
Spharv2
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:39 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:52 pm

I've found large advantages in industrialization as the South, and enough as the North to make it worthwhile, though I never go very heavy. But getting supplies near the front reduces the rail and riverine you have to use, which saves you money elsewhere. It might even out in the short term, but long term, I think it's a pretty nice advantage.
Official Queen's Ambassador to the South
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests