This is not the case. A division inside a corps or army stack will give the general's full complement of cps. (4/star)Major Dilemma wrote: -snip- With a division the unit is out of the chain of command even if it is in the same stack as a corps it is not in the chain of command. Therefore there is a 50% penalty. That is why you need two one star or one two star generals to satisfy the CP requirements unless you want to suffer the penalty of insufficient command for that division.
Again, just to be clear. Any generals in a corps or army stack are 'in' and will give their full cp value.Major Dilemma wrote:-snip- Divisions do not benefit from the chain of command and therefore the command point requirement must be satisfied with sufficient generals to overcome the out of command penalty which is 50%.
A corps/army can give up to 18 cps from generals only. (19 if you count the aide de camp) Four divisions in a corps/army stack will always cost 16 cps. There is no 50% penalty inside either of those stacks.Major Dilemma wrote:If your divisions are in the same stack as the corps your corps command points will contribute to the overall stack cp requirements of your divisions. Each of your divisions requires 4 CP and they each have one brigadier general assigned to them so each of your four divisions is running a deficit of two command points. That is a total deficit of 8 cp's for the four divisions. if those four divisions are placed within the corps stack which has a total of 16 cp's you should have a running total of 8 CP's in the positive.
This advice can be risky. Units in a stack (be they brigades, divisions, individual elements) do not all engage in every fight. A division engaging as a whole will always fare better than individual brigades coming piece-meal. There are always plenty of occasions for independent divisions, but they really function at their best in corps/army stacks.Major Dilemma wrote:I suggest you operate your divisions independently of your corps and armies until things are clear in your mind. Divisions do suffer the out of command penalty but in return they offer the opportunity to command 18 elements for the comparatively low cost of only four command points and a division can be fully operational when led by two one star generals. Divisions enable you to use your one star generals to effectively command brigades which are not necessarily the best choice to place into a corps.
No worries. Now you know too!Major Dilemma wrote:Glad you cleared that up. I did not know division leaders lend their full cp's to a corps stack. Probably because I never put divisions within a Corps. (I rarely keep them in the same region as a corps either). I should not have spoken about it to confuse someone.
You broke your game?Major Dilemma wrote:On a related note: How is it I can have an army stack with 24 CP's? (no divisions within it)
Strategic rating does nothing for cps outside of needing a 4+ to be able to count as an aide de camp. What other generals are in the stack?Major Dilemma wrote:I do have Lee with 24 cp's for his stack. Needless to say I was quite pleased. I have often got the Army to 23 but only once to 24. I think it may have to do with his strategy value. (I use random generated ratings).
I do have the game saved and I have installed that FastStone image viewer program but i don't know how to use it.. doh i guess i could try but really i think the additional cp's are a result of exceptional strat values.
I guess the aide de camp thing allows a general to aid his own camp/dunno for sure.
It is the game (against the AI) where I got Lee to 2399 power before 1863 in his army stack with no divisions. I keep repeating it but nobody seems to notice...
Gray_Lensman wrote:It can get a little difficult at times to "capture" the tooltip, however it helps to go into the "Media" tab of the "Options" box and set the "Tooltip Delay" to High (all the way to the right). That'll slow the tooltip appearance down. The rest is up to your nimble fingers.
[color="Blue"]Though it is frowned upon, we also cut new forum members some slack while they are getting familiar with the forum and how things usually are doneGray_Lensman wrote:Yes, you posted this same exact post over an hour ago. Considering Soloswolf and Major Dilemma took the time to give you detailed answers over there, I suggest you return to your original post and read the answers provided. Double posting on any forum, not just AGEod's is generally frowned on for just this reason.
Leeds wrote:If I have a corps stack with a 2 star general containing with 3 divisions (and 3accompanying 1 star generals), have I satisfied the CP requirement of 12 so that I am not penalized?
Leeds wrote:Likewise, if I have an army stack with a 3 star general containing 2 corps (with two 2 star generals) containing a total of 6 divisions (each with a 1 star general) am in compliance with the CP requirement of 4?
Major Dilemma wrote:Is it true the army HQ requires four cp's until it is combined to create an army?
kglorberau wrote:Stupid question I know....but what is a General's "strategic rating"??
Is it how well he fights, defends, etc (the three numbes at the bottom of his elements info), or that he fights better in certain strategic areas (Mississippi, Virginia, etc).
Kglorberau
Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests