Solo or Multi (for strategy games only)

I only play against the computer
49%
175
I mostly play against the PC, but plan/have done some multi
28%
100
I do and enjoy both roughly equally.
8%
28
I mostly play multi but on occasion can play against the PC
9%
31
I only play multi and have only done practice against the PC
7%
26
 
Total votes: 360
User avatar
Duc_d_Heilsberg
Lieutenant
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Tournon sur Rhône, France

Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:10 am

As lot of people here have always said : I'm playing alone versus the AI to master the game (because it's quite complex and there are a lot of things to manage ; lack of medium scenarii ? :siffle: ).

As soon as I get used with the mechanisms (it's a long road because I don't play as much as I would, furthermore, I spend a lot of time readind the forum looking after all the informations that are not included in the manual :innocent: ) I'll go asking for a human partner to friendly compete in winning the ACW.

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:55 am

I wonder at the longevity of the game (or any game) for people that play against the AI only. I know that in games where I am unable to play PBEM I only play for a couple of months even for the good games. When I play PBEM I can play happily for years as there seems to be so much more diversity; every opponent is a new and complex "AI" to try and out-think (and also out-bluff - something not possible with Athena). There is something so much more fulfilling about playing a human opponent, winning is sweeter, losing harder and the conversation along the way is certainly more interesting!

Cheers, Chris

User avatar
denisonh
Captain
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:18 pm

MP presents the player a much different situation from decision making process than solo play.

I like the feel it brings because of the effects of consequences on decision making and gameplay. Risk taking is more difficult, in that your human opponent is more likely to exploit your failures than the AI and adapt his strategy/tactics. Trying to discern your opponents intentions are part of the charm.

These interactions are what a major art of the appeal of the multiplayer game.

In my longest running PBEM, it is a lost cause. Been that way since the beginning when I made some gross errors (1862 was a fiasco). But it is interesting and am learning a great deal about the game after being schooled by a very good opponent. It is only a game, after all, but most certainly a fun one.

simovitch
Corporal
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:54 pm

AI will take the abuse

Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:43 pm

Solo for now. I enjoy beating the Blue/Grey AI by '63 and continuing the campaign until the AI's NM is 0. No human would endure such abuse.

I plan to seek a PBEM opponent soon.

DirkX
Lieutenant
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:09 pm

Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:45 am

i started vs Ai (which was pretty decent back then)
but when i started vs humans i didnt touch a single game vs the AI, it frankly cant compete with human opponents and the AI is , sadly, (pbem is rather slow and i usually like playing vs AI) boring me now :siffle:

this means i am playing a lot less AACW than when i started it.

User avatar
RELee
Lieutenant
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: In America playing French games.

Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:25 pm

Although I haven't purchased the game yet, I can answer because the answer will not change. I burned myself out on MP games long ago, and I'm just too busy to try to venture back into that world. I will be purchasing and playing ACW solo very soon as I reckon time.

:cwboy:

Guru80
Colonel
Posts: 311
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:34 am

Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:39 am

I have only played against the AI thus far but plan on playing a lot of PbEM hopefully. Since I JUST got the game recently and only played about 10 turns in about 10 times trying to figure things out in the 114 turn campaign I think I will wait until I know what the hell I am doing, thinking I am getting there though!

This game is so simple yet so complex and large in scope and I LOVE IT. Favorite war game by far.

Flashman007
Corporal
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 4:54 pm

Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:14 pm

Did my learning against the AI but find that as good as the AI is, it is pretty pathetic when compared to playing against a human. Once you play against a human it is very difficult to go back to playing against the AI. I noted the poll showed 50% of the players are interested in multiplayer. This game has fallen short of its promises with regard to supporting multiplayer. :grr:

User avatar
Alias
Conscript
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:59 am
Location: Italy

Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:29 am

I started first playing against the AI, just few games, after I've played only in PBEM, human is much better than AI (most of the times) :)

User avatar
GShock
Posts: 1134
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:30 pm

Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:42 am

As most of the habituees of the forums have noticed, after buying the game in august and experimenting on the scenarios so far, i've finally started my first campaign.

I will only play ONE vs the AI and I'm positive I will learn a lot, afterwards i will most likely only play MP and only test the AI to give what little contribution i can to help devs make it better. :)

I am very very intrigued by the Grand Campaign actually but i don't exclude i will also play some pbem. :cwboy:

User avatar
muddymonkey77
Captain
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: New York

Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:01 am

I usually battle myself. Strange. I do LOVE this ability though!
Image

User avatar
McDuff
Private
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:55 pm
Location: Metz, France

Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:04 pm

I play solo, 'cause it's not so easy to find someone available each time I want to play... :siffle:

User avatar
GlobalExplorer
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact: Website

Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:45 pm

SP all the way. I am after escapism when I play a game, if I want to be with people I go to the pub.

User avatar
GlobalExplorer
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact: Website

Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:48 pm

But I admit that it must be challenging to play against a human. We tried that some times with Panzer General but we never finished. My mate was driving me nuts with taking endless time for his turns. When he learned that he could move the mouse over my units and see the predicted outcome he was trying out literally any combination.

Rexor
Sergeant
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: The great, great Garden State

Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:58 pm

GlobalExplorer wrote:SP all the way. I am after escapism when I play a game, if I want to be with people I go to the pub.


Hear, hear!

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:14 pm

GlobalExplorer wrote:But I admit that it must be challenging to play against a human. We tried that some times with Panzer General but we never finished. My mate was driving me nuts with taking endless time for his turns. When he learned that he could move the mouse over my units and see the predicted outcome he was trying out literally any combination.


I've played a few friends in PBEM games. If they take to the game there is nothing better than giving them a good beating and nothing worse than losing to them - especially if they are gobby sods and you have to see them in a pub the next day.

To find somebody with a similar turn rate and interest in history though I have had more success playing strangers who turn into friends. Not all but quite a few do over the years.

Cheers, Chris

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:52 pm

I'm quite surprised by the number of people here who only play against the AI. I assume that people who visit game forums are more likely to play PBEM games so the number of players that play solo is probably even higher than this poll indicates.

Rafiki, wasn't there once a post where you said you would give PBEM a go even though you thought a game might take you years? I tried to find the post but I couldn't (I thought it was in this thread). Just wondered how it went?

One game I would love to play but have never bothered to try is War in the Pacific. I played Uncommon Valor but a full PBEM of WitP would take me about 8 or 9 years at nearly one turn a day. I still drool over it though and I'm sure I will get it someday. I suppose VgN could be seen in the same way but I see it more as a game system that can be used to simulate any period between 1850 and 1920 and if you really have a lot of time on your hands you could play the entire period. WitP is different I think because unless you play the full campaign you don't get to see the industry and resource management aspect of the game. If you plan to build a carrier it will take quite some time to make it to sea but playing VgN for a reasonable 5 or 10 year period will allow the player to experience most of what the game has to offer.

Cheers, Chris

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:54 pm

Hobbes wrote:Rafiki, wasn't there once a post where you said you would give PBEM a go even though you thought a game might take you years? I tried to find the post but I couldn't (I thought it was in this thread). Just wondered how it went?

[SIZE="1"]You probably didn't go far enough back.... and it's still pending..... Image[/size]
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE
Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[/CENTER]

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:00 pm

Pending meaning you haven't made turn 1 yet? :nuts:

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:04 pm

Yes please, rub it in, will ya! :p :(
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE

Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[/CENTER]

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:09 pm

Rafiki wrote:Yes please, rub it in, will ya! :p :(


Where the hell was that post? I think you were right Raf, it may take you some time!

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:16 am

Since I'm always fond of outing myself for public humiliation; here's where you'll find arsan's first suggestion for starting it: http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?p=73959#post73959 :siffle:
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE

Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[/CENTER]

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Thu Aug 21, 2008 6:38 pm

:mdr:
Hey! When Rafiki and me say "extremist PBEM" we really mean it!! :nuts:
First turn is inminent.... Any year now. :siffle:
Second turn is expected to be played with AACW 2 (we will lobby for a save game transfer system between AACW and AACW2 just for this :king :)
Cheers!

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:46 pm

:siffle:

OK, time to put my money where my mouth (keyboard?) is. :indien:

Shall we start a game with 1.11 (public beta), this weekend?
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE

Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[/CENTER]

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:38 pm

Hi Rafiki!

Sorry, bad timing for me :p leure:
I share my home computer with my girlfriend who need it for a work until 15 September or so. I only have a couple of hours a day to use the PC and i'm trying hard to end the WIA manual translation on these 2 hours/day. :siffle:

Luckily i can post around here form the work PC and while my girlfriend goes to the bathroom :niark: But its not enough to do a AACW turn...

Could we postpone it a little longer, lets say... until mid September?? :cwboy:
Cheers!

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:41 pm

Naturallemente :)

Perhaps by then, I can persuade you to get into ICQ? ;)
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE

Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[/CENTER]

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:17 pm

Rafiki wrote:Naturallemente :)

Perhaps by then, I can persuade you to get into ICQ? ;)


Humm... ICQ?? maybe, maybe... i will think about it... :siffle:
But MS messenger, never!! :indien: :niark:

User avatar
Stwa
Colonel
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:01 am

Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:03 pm

I only play against the computer.

I have a few suggestions for "AI only" games.

1. Create an option where the AI can play itself. I think WITP could do this, and this should be fairly easy to setup. (I think)...

2. Create an option where the AAR against the AI is automated. Then these can be posted to the web for sharing with others. Probably similar to re-play, but shows both sides, and does not have to show the actual movement, (just the ending locations each turn). Allow a snapshot feature for screenies.

3. Imagine how much code could be deleted from the exe if MP was not provided at all.

4. Also, currently I suppose we have only Athena as an AI opponent, but perhaps some other AI "opponents" could be developed, with snappier, more aggressive names, like Thor or Meathead or something like that.

razorbackjac
Captain
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:02 am
Location: arkansas

Must have decent ai

Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:34 pm

Queeg wrote:Yes! I won't buy a game anymore unless I know the developer has a good track record for strong AI. My shelves are littered with promising games (many of them high-profile, big-budget titles) that are all but unplayable due to an abysmal AI. (Since this board is a congenial place, I won't list them here.)

I agree. I play solo mainly but will do multi/pbem here and there. Solo over all is it for me. ;)

User avatar
jastaV
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:22 am

Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:37 pm

I just played few game turns in my first PBEM: that was sufficient to let me reconsider things and opinions!

Athena is good for getting some hours of fun (without having to wait your PBEM opponent returning you files), for scenarios testing, for testing strategies and for learning......
When you call for a real challenge you have to play against BPEM opponents!

:wacko:
Ney: The army will not move!
Napoleon: The army will obey me!
Ney: The army will obey to its Generals’ orders!

[SIZE="1"]Fontainebleau, April 1814[/size]

Return to “General discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests