arsan wrote:Another thing i noticed on the Demo Trafalgar scenario is that one of the spanish leaders (the one with the fleet at Corunna) was a general not an admiral.
Is this intended?
Cheers!
It is Don Miguel De Alava, see his interesting story below.
From "Napoleon series" web site :
"Don Miguel-Ricardo de Alava holds a unique, but little-known, place in the history of the Napoleonic Wars. This naval officer, army officer, politician and ambassador is reputed to be the only man present at both of this period's two crucial military events: the Battle of Trafalgar (21.10.1805) and the Battle of Waterloo (18.06.1815).
Born in Vittoria in 1770, Alava began his military career in the Spanish Navy. In spite of having risen to the rank of captain (in command of a frigate) Alava subsequently decided to exchange services and continue his career - starting at the rank of captain - in the Spanish Army. So it was s an officer of marines that Alava participated in the first of the two great Napoleonic defeats - that of Trafalgar in 1805.
Alava had been posted to the 'Santa Ana,' the 112-gun flagship of his uncle, Vice-Admiral Ignacio-Maria de Alava y Saenz de Navarrete (1750-1817). At Trafalgar, Alava y Saenz de Navarrete commanded the Cadiz squadron and was second-in-command to Admiral Don Federico-Carlos Gravina y Napoli (1756-09.03.1806) on the 112-gun 'Principe de Asturias' [1]. The third Spanish flag officer present was Rear-Admiral Don Balthasar-Hildalgo Cisneros de la Torre (1758-09.06.1829) on the 136-gun 'Santissima Trinidad' [2]."
Maybe, he shouldn't have command of an entire fleet as he didn't attained Amiral rank, do you think a tweak is necessary in this case ?
La mort est un mur, mourir est une brèche.