Suggestion for Roster readability

[Pdubya64]

This is admittedly a small thing, but for all of us with bad eyes, I would like to see the ledger changed a bit.
Here is a pic of what I am talking about:
[INDENT][/INDENT]

There seems to be more than enough room to enlarge the unit type boxes just a bit and make the "ribbons" thick enough to be easier to click on and see.

Also, I noticed that "Skirmishers" already appear under the "Irregular" page (as shown above); can we replace the existing "Skirmishers" page with one called "Elite"? Right now there isn't any way to sort to your elite units with the roster- they don't show up anywhere I have seen.

Thx

[lpremus]

I have noticed that the blockade ship groups show up in both light and heavy due to having one frigate(light) and one steam frigate(heavy) I suggest that they be parsed out into their own category called blockader just like the raider ship category is.

Thanks

[WhoCares]

The divisional HQ button isn't required anymore. Or it might be changed to list generals in command of a division.

[Pdubya64]

The divisional HQ button isn't required anymore. Or it might be changed to list generals in command of a division.

Actually, I thought the same thing WhoCares, until I clicked on it only to see the roster pull up every CSA Division sorted by Commander- useful in my book, so I didn't mention it.

[richfed]

Good suggestions, Pdubya64 ...

[WhoCares]

Actually, I thought the same thing WhoCares, until I clicked on it only to see the roster pull up every CSA Division sorted by Commander- useful in my book, so I didn't mention it.

So you tell me that someone had the same great idea as I had, and that before me?! Great