TrenchFoot wrote:Just imagine how 50 years from now people will be discussing on forums, "Ever play that WWI game from AGEOD?", "Oh yea, that was classic, they don't make gems like that anymore"
bob. wrote:Anyone here played Offensive a Outrance?
Just spent my day... yep, the entire day setting this up.
Portrays the 1914 campaign in the West at divisional level with some smaller independent units thrown in.
It has a very interesting feature where every formation has two counters: one that is placed on the map and one that is placed on an army display. This allows things like shifting around forces in different armies and corps.
There's also an East front 1914 game of the same designer and same scale but I am waiting for the reprint on that one.
FleetingThought wrote:These were just some of the incredible board games from the late '70's onward. Card games, too!
A friend of mine I had the pure luck to work with for a few years, Craig Taylor, Sr., made a card game called Naval Wars for I think Avalon Hill. Absolutely fun game. Had the chance to work with him, Arnold Hendrick (also from Avalon Hill), Gene Billingsley (GMT Games) and Mark Herman. Good times!
Keith Zabalaoui, founder of the company that did the Close Combat games (the originals), also a bunch of titles on WW2 for Three-Sixty before that, also a good friend, and a neighbor for awhile a few years ago.
All of them inspiring.
Craig died recently, quite sad. Hearty and hale old man.
Just a little history; I don't have the stamina to dig in the way I used to. Still try to keep up, though, and AGEOD and Panther in Australia are now my two favorite historical war game devs!
The genre will never die; it's the most satisfying kind of gaming there is.
Taciturn Scot wrote:Whew! I haven't played THAT one but I did once play 'Drang Nach Osten', another absolutely massive monster that took about a day to set up and ages to make your turns. My friend and I played it solidly over a Bank Holiday weekend back in the early '80s. Fortunately, my friend let me play the German side but it was a nightmare to manage. I admire your perseverance.The funny thing about playing games on that scale is that you lose focus very easily. TEAW is nowhere near as big either of these games but it is about as big as I can handle nowadays.
bob. wrote:Well, it's not so much perseverance as just that I "found" a spare room where I can leave this game set up basically indefinitely. I can still play any other smaller board games, so if I take two years to play this then who cares! Might get a little dusty though...
It is a lot of units but I think not as many as you may think at first glance. It is "only" divisional level mostly and there are lots of unmoveable units or units that are not directly involved in combat like Corps HQs, Army HQs or siege artillery.
Here's how it looks set up (South part is not on the pic)
I really love these army boxes. I think they are a great way to organize the units! I don't know any other games that do this.
TrenchFoot wrote:Just imagine how 50 years from now people will be discussing on forums, "Ever play that WWI game from AGEOD?", "Oh yea, that was classic, they don't make gems like that anymore"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests