Jim-NC wrote:So Kensai,
You are asking for blind obedience to the red events then? I mean if Germany can't get the territory until the red even happens, then why are we trying to make the world our own? Why are we playing a different game if we only want what happened historically.
Red events are "stimuli". Red events prone you to respond, in case you want to be a happy puppy in peace with everyone. If the red events are designed correctly (not all of them are, unfortunately) they will give Prestige penalties in case you don't reply to them. Germany can make the world it wants, but the Chinese player should not be allowed to sell Chinese national territory as we have no means to abstract correctly what would the population would say about it. That's why I urge everyone to play and resolve things IN the game, not out of it.
In your comments, you say "it ruins the game to speed up events" (see below). Thus, America and Spain must go to war in 1898 to satisfy you? By your reckoning, Spain can't declare war right now, as it didn't historically?
They
can go to war, they don't must. If they don't, one of them is gonna lose Prestige. That's the whole point with the red event stimuli. Force you in dilemmas and shape the history with alternative what if.
Blind obedience is not the answer.
Sure, but changing the rules mid game and mid war isn't either. I will say it again, if I knew that some players were gonna change the rules midair I would have had a different strategy for Japan. I did what I did with what I thought was possible and ALLOWED using the game's facilities. And this not even in a gamey way.
I started a war with another regional power that I knew it had no serious navy (and couldn't get one) and I was aware that most Europeans would not care to interfere given the long way from home ports. These were sound assumptions made in game that were impossible to change without asking for some witty uncalled for script.
---
The problem in this game is that people fear players, not nations. It happened to sagji, now it happens to me. No problem, I can play along as long as you make a viable story. To me, the American-French insistence to interfere in this war does not make any sense given Japan's and China's ranking and its regional nature. However, let's just say for the moment that they know (possibly only in hindsight, unfortunately) that a strong Japan might challenge them in the future. Let's say ok. But Germany? Germany should be partying behind the scenes actually for this war, as it makes its direct rivals weaker, instead we see Germany finding Japan "a menace to the world", which is quite anticlimatic for the historical prose of the game.
Anyway, I will enjoy this immensely as I still have a minor suspicion that all this might be "a plan within a plan" from the American-French side. They are about to lure Germany in a war with a Far East power it should not have a stake into and they will disengage at the right moment (possibly changing sides as well) leaving Germany to fight alone Japan, while allying with the rest of Germany's rivals. If this happens, that would be immensely fun indeed. And it will make more sense, historically and gamewise, as Japan is not a menace to the Prestige rankings.
Onwards! Let's give them a run for their money, please post nice stories for our AAR!
