If yes, why choose such a stupid name?
If you dumbed down the name even further it would be Goo-Goo-Da-Da.

Susana wrote:We believe it's a more approachable name from a sales perspective and we want to make sure we expand the existing gamer base for this game. The current fans who have known the name as "Vainglory" can take comfort in knowing this is a pure business decision made and the content will be exactly the same i.e high quality gameplay and class which you have come to expect from AGEOD titles.
Kind regards
Susana Meza
Pride of Nations
Pride of Nations is a historical strategy game featuring a simultaneous turn-based engine, putting players at the head of the world’s Great Powers between 1850 and 1920. Eight nations are playable in single-player and multiplayer – USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, Russia, Austria-Hungary and Italy. Pride of Nations is developed by AGEOD set for release 2011.
vonRocko wrote:Ageod sold their soul to paradix. Now they can't even name their own games!LMFAO
richfed wrote:Saw that, too, in a Paradox e-mail. As long as the game is good, I don't care what it is called. That's a marketing call.
Ageod sold their soul to paradix. Now they can't even name their own games! LMFAO
Slick Wilhelm wrote:Paradox Marketing suit: "Yeah, and since the name change to Pride of Nations was such a good move, we can change the names of the older titles to Napoleon's Many Battles, America when it was Really Young, Lifting up of Prussia and Ageod's Americans Being Naughty"![]()
Hobbes wrote:Well said Kosmoface!
Otherwise 'Rage of Empires' might do the trick![]()
kosmoface wrote:"Rage of Empires" would certainly be better. You need something bold (-> 'Rage of Empires'), something strange (->'Vainglory of Nations') or something people can relate to (->'Empires - The Road to WW1' or somesuch), if you want to be seen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests