User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

How widespread is H1N1?

Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:27 pm

Very unscientific approach here, but curious as to how widespread the virus is.

Right now I know 4 people that have/had it. How many do you know of?
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus

User avatar
caranorn
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:30 pm

0!
Marc aka Caran...

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:14 pm

One so far - but a friend of a friend. Tibet seems like a hotspot :)

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:29 pm

caranorn wrote:0!


+1! ;)
Here in Spain next week will start massive vaccination campaign: 10 million people will be getting it :blink:
Pharmaceutical companies must be happy... No global crisis for them :cool:
Personally i'm not worried at all.
I bet this will not be much worse than any other year's flu. :)

User avatar
caranorn
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:14 pm

Some people at work already got vaccinated, I'm rather sceptic though. But the problem is that I work with handicaped kids right now, so maybe I'll get innoculated after all as I would not want to spread anything to them...

But mostly I think it's hype, and a lot of money for the big medical companies...
Marc aka Caran...

User avatar
Le Ricain
Posts: 3284
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:21 am
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:01 am

Here in Scotland, we had an estimated 19,200 cases of H1N1 recorded at local GP's last week. Of these 176 were admitted to hospital and of these 4 people died.

In England, during the summer the Labour candidate for the Norwich North parliamentary seat was admitted to hospital with H1N1 in the middle of the campaign. He did not get out before election day, but it did not matter as the Conservatives won the election.

As I am considered someone at risk, I get my flu shot on Tuesday.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

'Nous voilà, Lafayette'

Colonel C.E. Stanton, aide to A.E.F. commander John 'Black Jack' Pershing, upon the landing of the first US troops in France 1917

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25669
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:27 am

0 and counting ;)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
dooya
Posts: 1311
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Always near to Vicky Pollard.
Contact: Website

Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:39 am

Le Ricain wrote:[...]
As I am considered someone at risk, [...]
You are pregnant? Congratulations. :niark:


Zero flue cases among the people I know (which is, however, also very close to zero :blink: )
No quote - No bullshit!

User avatar
Jim-NC
Posts: 2981
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Location: Near Region 209, North Carolina

Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:22 pm

I know of 2 from the summer, none this fall.
Remember - The beatings will continue until morale improves.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:36 pm

Now it's up to 6 people, and sadly one has died. A previously very healthy young man of 27.
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus

User avatar
Mickey3D
Posts: 1569
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:32 pm

1 here (my wife).

Seems the disease is spreading very fast in Switzerland.

User avatar
Adlertag
Posts: 2423
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:35 pm
Location: Lyon(France)

Sat Nov 14, 2009 4:36 pm

And now, in France, with the vaccination campaign growing, we are beginning to see the first Guillain–Barré syndrome...
The people are upset by the use of additive (adjuvant) to help the vaccine to me more efficient but then we don't understand why pregnant women (for example) may benefit from the version without additive (thus less risky) and others (like common man) will have to take the vaccine with additive...
Probably because, with additive, you can prepare more vaccine and at a lower cost. :bonk:
La mort est un mur, mourir est une brèche.

User avatar
Cat Lord
Posts: 1806
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:07 pm
Location: Lausanne, Suisse

Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:15 pm

The documentation available in Switzerland on the government site is very complete and clear, for anyone with a bit of background in epidemiology (which is my case):

http://www.bag.admin.ch/influenza/06411/index.html?lang=fr

Vaccination will start the 16th of November, and with us having a baby under 6 months old, I will make sure we get jabs as early as possible.

It takes 21 days for your immune system to grow up antibodies with the vaccine. And if the jab is done in two doses (I think it's the case in Switzerland) you get 100% immunity only 21 days after the second jab. That's 42 days, i.e. Xmas time.

If the epidemic peak is at the beginning of next year (which is likely as this is a common pattern for the flu), people will rush to get the jab just after XMas, which would be much too late, and which would seriously desorganise the vaccination campaign.

My advice to anyone here:
- Look at the stats in the document above. The chances to get any very rare side effect from the vaccine are much lower than getting the flu in its most dangerous form (which can kill healthy young person without any medical problem, contrary to the normal flu, however rare the occurence is)
- Get yourself vaccinated as early as you can.

Cheers,

Cat
[CENTER]
Image[/CENTER]

User avatar
dooya
Posts: 1311
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Always near to Vicky Pollard.
Contact: Website

Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:53 pm

In Germany, it was announced last week that there will be not enough vaccine to vaccinate a large majority of the public right now, but that they expect to get enough of it by March 2010. When do they expect the epidemic peak? :niark:
No quote - No bullshit!

tc237
Colonel
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Allegheny Arsenal

Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:56 am

H1N1 is the worst pandemic ever!!!
or at least until the Health Nationalization Bill is passed.

User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

There's an app for that...

Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:09 pm

Or almost.

Engineers from Google are working on a product known as Google Flu Trends http://www.google.org/flutrends/. This is a very simple, yet elegant and important application of what might be termed predictive analytics.

The product, which launched last year, works by analyzing searches that have correlated strongly in the past with flu statistics as put out by the CDC and other governmental agencies. The advantage of this is that whereas the CDC typically works on a 10 to 14 day lag before new flu statistics are published, the Flu Trends numbers can be turned around literally overnight. Flu Trends does not predict the future per se, so much as it "predicts the present", as the engineers describe it.

To read more on this go to

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/11/how-swine-flus-been-spreading.html
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus

User avatar
dooya
Posts: 1311
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Always near to Vicky Pollard.
Contact: Website

Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:42 pm

gchristie wrote:Or almost.

Engineers from Google are working on a product known as Google Flu Trends http://www.google.org/flutrends/. This is a very simple, yet elegant and important application of what might be termed predictive analytics.

The product, which launched last year, works by analyzing searches that have correlated strongly in the past with flu statistics as put out by the CDC and other governmental agencies. The advantage of this is that whereas the CDC typically works on a 10 to 14 day lag before new flu statistics are published, the Flu Trends numbers can be turned around literally overnight. Flu Trends does not predict the future per se, so much as it "predicts the present", as the engineers describe it.

To read more on this go to

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/11/how-swine-flus-been-spreading.html
Ahh, good to know that the flu does not spread in areas with no internet connection. :bonk: :wacko:
No quote - No bullshit!

User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:58 pm

Yes, whatever you do do not go online! Or at least make sure you wear a mask.
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus

Taillebois
General of the Army
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:09 pm
Location: Nr GCHQ Cheltenham

Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:57 pm

There's a 110% correlation between those scared of Swine Flu and those scared of Global Warming.

I've found that if I go into a crowded bar, such as here in Cheltenham where it's been horse race weekend, a quick sneeze (or fake sneeze) clears the bar queue and makes for rapid drink service. Just do it when the bar staff are out of ear shot.

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:32 pm

Taillebois wrote:There's a 110% correlation between those scared of Swine Flu and those scared of Global Warming.

I've found that if I go into a crowded bar, such as here in Cheltenham where it's been horse race weekend, a quick sneeze (or fake sneeze) clears the bar queue and makes for rapid drink service. Just do it when the bar staff are out of ear shot.


Better left if at 99%
At least i am much more scared of global warming than flu :)

User avatar
McNaughton
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:37 pm

Well one has to then think if we did not 'over-react' then what would indeed happen? Just because there are no massive numbers of deaths reported does not mean that all efforts were wasted (how do you prove either way? Either there was no threat at all, or all efforts done made sure to eliminate the threat!).

IMO, sure, we spent some money, and maybe the money was not 'required', but is it better to be sure that we don't have a pandemic, or take the risk and save a few dollars? To me, this is also the agrument of Global Warming.

We have two choices, and two possible results.

We do nothing, or we do something.
Nothing happens, or something happens.

If we do something, and nothing happens, the worst we are is out money.

If we do something, and something happens, when it does, the effects are not catastrophic.

If we do nothing, and nothing happens, we saved money.

If we do nothing, and something happens, we are in a pickle.

Basically, if we do nothing, the results are extremes. Either everything is the same, or everything is in chaos. If we do something, the results are much less extreme on each end (the good is less good, but the bad is less bad).

Are you a gambler?

Remember, in gambling the house usually wins, and with pandemics and climate change, nature is the house, we are merely the players.

User avatar
caranorn
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:48 pm

McNaughton, you are forgetting the possible side effects of innoculation. That means if there is no deadly pandemic and we innoculate everyone, we will not just have lost money but also lives. Not to mention lost trust...

Remember, "cry wolf"...

User avatar
Jamescott
Private
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:23 am
Location: United States

Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:44 pm

I'm in Minnesota. Back in September/October the flu hit pretty hard. I know of at least 10 people that had the H1N1 flu. Only one case was serious where an 11 year old boy ended up in the hospital for a few days. He had both the flu and bronchitis at the same time. Everything turned out okay. I don't know of anyone getting hit recently.
"Good fortune is more fatal to princes than adversity: during the former they are intoxicated with presumption; the second renders them circumspect and modest." ~ Frederick the Great

Return to “General discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests