[color="Red"][SIZE="6"]Early June 63 result and Late June orders[/size][/color]
[SIZE="3"]EASTERN THEATRE[/size]
Virginia
Do you know I really did feel that I'd never be putting up the sub heading of
Virginia again for the eastern campaign

Oh I had reckoned on the odd cavalry excursion or two into the state but a full blown campaign!!!!!.....never in a million years. Just goes to show that you cannot trust these devious human players

Seems I was right about where JEB Stuart was hiding. To add insult to injury Jackson made the move that I did not want him to and sidestepped me to the Northwest at Charlottesville. Banks my friend when you eventually read this all I can say is ....well played
Jacksons fast mover trait means that my forces, particularly Hamiltons Corp, is scrabbling to keep up and get back to Washington. I continue to try to bring Stonewalls invading army to battle.
I think, no if I'm completely honest
I know, that in the two encounters that occurred in Virginia that I had huge slices of luck. Much more than I had a right to expect. Both of them I suspect were because of dwindling cohesion levels of my opponents forces, after all they have been on the march now for at least two months without rest.
First off there was Stuarts assault on Manassas from out of the darkness. Almost 2500 cavalry with 15 cannon against my single regiment of less than 500. As you can see from the battle report I even lost the dice roll but whoopee

my
good ol' boys held. Now one thing I will say is that the single regiment of mine that was defending was a Zouaves not a Militia unit. Its my self imposed rule of using Northern Militia only sparingly.
Were I to be in Banks' shoes that result alone would have made me pig sick but the next would have almost had me smashing the computer screen.
On day 14 Stonewall Jackson steamrollers into Manassas. Again I have a single Zouaves regiment defending. Naturally everything in the potential line of confederate advance for the last month has been on
'defend to the death' but its still only a single regiment against a 16,000 strong seasoned Corp. Yet that single regiment, the 114th Pennsylvanian Zouaves d'Afrique under the able command of Darius N Couch held

How they held Lord alone knows but hold they did.

So I had the luck of the dice roll this time but 600 against 16,000. It almost mirrors 300 Spartans. Anyway its certainly brought Jacksons march to an abrupt halt and better still denied him the Manassas depot. If I could I'd promote Couch overnight and strike a medal of honour for every last man jack of the unit.
If I were Banks I really would be right
gutted about that result although on a personal level it demonstrates one of the finer aspects of AACW. Namely that you cannot take victories or defeats, no matter what the odds, for granted. I can understand how some purchasers of the game might take such a result as being
'unfair' ,
'impossible' or indicating in some way or other that the mechanics are
'flawed' or
'unrealistic'. My own response is that the history of warfare thoughout the ages is littered with battles won and lost when either defeat or victory seemed impossible to achieve. IMHO
'long may uncertainty of result reign'.
Anyhow the confederate advance on Washington has stalled, at least temporarily. Perhaps now I can bring Stonewall to battle. This then is the current position with my proposed moves highlighted. You will note that at Harpers Ferry, Rousseau's force has arrived. Sadly he was inactive during the move and additionally he did not reach Harpers Ferry until the evening of the 14th. Hmmm if he'd only have turned up a day sooner I could really have given Stuarts cavalry Corp a bloody nose. Trouble is he's again inactive. I want him to stiffen the defences behind Washington ..... that rebel cavalry could still do a fair bit of damage

The rail lines are chewed up however and its going to take him well over 14 days to reach his destination. Ah well no sense in fretting over things I cannot control he will just have to do the best he can.
Wadsworth's division, at Aqua has a 9 day march to reach Washington so thats where he has been ordered (he dithered before leaving the Amherst depot). OK so he only commands 5,500 but it might be enough to take the sting out of Jackson if he meets him. At least thats the theory. Hamiltons Corp, also at Aqua, has 3 days march before he reaches Manassas. If Stonewall assaults the depot again it might just provide me with a big enough time window to allow Hamilton to arrive and engage him. My fear is that Jackson will not stop, even though his supply condition is
yellow Therefore Hamilton has orders to march straight on to Alexandria and then to Washington. That march is expected to take his Corp 14 days (too long) so I've issued forced march instructions which if obeyed should get him to Washington in 11.
I was going to move Franklins Corp at the Amherst depot to Manassas as indicated by the white line but I've decided against it. It occurs to me that Banks might, just might decide to turn South. Its difficult to see how he can seriously expect to take Washington or even Manassas now so he might cut and run particularly as Jackson is outstripping the movement of his other invading Corp, Johnsons', by a country mile. If he does turn back then it seems to me that two options are available to him. One is an audacious strike using those shuffling sidestep moves to launch Stonewall against Richmond. The other to merge both of his Corps. The latter could be attractive as whilst Jackson appears to be running short of supplies Johnson looks to have more than adequate.
As I no longer have a need for the Amherst depot I've decided to 'blow' it. I'm detaching a division from Franklins Corp to move to Richmond and join Barlow......just in case Banks does make a dart in that direction. Franklin I'm moving South to Lynchburg. It has a twofold benefit. Firstly it lengthens considerably the Rebel line of retreat without supply should Banks decide to retire with Jackson. Secondly it provides another counter for any potential sortie out of North Carolina by Robert E Lee and associates.
North Carolina
To begin with my assessment of the available troops on both sides in the area. The interesting thing to note is that Banks split Longstreets command, transferring two of his divisions to RE Lee who then moved to Raleigh to reinforce Beauregards force. Mighty interesting. On the face of it - just a strengthening move yet it does provide him with an opportunity to swing out Northeast towards Hillsboro and beyond. I think my move of Franklin to Lynchburg may yet be a wise one.
This is the current picture. All moves were executed as ordered. Grant and McDowell are at the gates of the Wilmington fortress. I've ordered my 40,000 to assault - Red/Red stance. I calculate that there is up to about 8,000 confederate defenders so the odds should be around 4 or 5 to 1. It could be enough. Then again it might not. Consequently I've ordered Crittendens Corp to march to Wilmington. His 12,500 will take 9 days to arrive but if my initial assault has been repulsed, providing I've done sufficient damage, his arrival might be enough to swing a second battle my way.
As you can see theres a wee bit of loose rebel cavalry thats popped up in my rear. Its an irritant but no more so I'm not going to worry about it. Other than the assault its a hold move across the remainder of the front.
This really is a big turn for both of us in this theatre methinks. Can I throw Jackson back at Manassas or Washington?. Can I take Wilmington?. If I fail to do the former then the whole of the Union heartland is threatened. If I fail to do the latter then Grants command could start to starve.
[SIZE="3"]WESTERN THEATRE[/size]
Kentucky
Another state I hoped I'd not have to put a subheading up for again in this game. (sigh) A typically fine move on the part of my opponent this time at Paducah with Indians against my lone garrisoning regiment. Once again somehow I managed to hold on. Not one attack did I survive, not two but three. Banks really did have such bad luck with the battles this turn.
If his assault on Paducah had been successful it really would have thrown a spanner in the works. Thats a key depot for me. I'm scurrying troops back as fast as their little legs will carry them
Theres not the sight or sign of any further enemy incursions into the area so I think its a
'one off' attack. I do hope so.
Trouble is I'm taking too many cities in this theatre at present. Its stretching my lines and weakening my ability to satisfactorily garrison. I need reinforcements. In fact you could say I'm somewhat desperate for them.
Tennessee
Well I've uncovered those Confederate armies again. In many respects much as I expected although I did glup a bit on discovering that Polk has 5 divisions in attendance. Joe Johnston's Corp at Grundy also makes me particularly uneasy. Its most unlike Banks to push a Corp so far out on a flank that its unsupported......unless that is he has other ideas for its use. Now whats the betting he's considering another assault on Bowling Green with that command? Hmmm I suspect better than even odds. Anyway thats what I'm going to assume. To guard against that eventuality.....it really is a move I cannot allow to happen as it would throw the whole campaign in the West into reverse I'm going to move Sumners back to Nashville with Stevens Corp of 13,000 at Nashville being ordered to retire to Bowling Green.
The only offensive move of any description I'm attempting in the current period is to move Griersons cavalry command to Rome. Its a gamble and will not cost too much even if it fails spectacularly but if it comes off it will interdict one of the few remaining confederate supply routes to those front line troops.
On the subject of supply just look at those two rebel depots at Knoxville and Chattanooga. See how they are exhausted of resources. For me its an encouraging sign and demonstrates that the South really is beginning to creek in terms of supporting its war effort. That brings me back as well to those divisions commanded by Polk. None of them appear to be anywhere close to full strength. My educated guess is that Banks has not had the manpower to replace his losses - another encouraging sign.
[SIZE="3"]LOWER SEABOARD[/size]
Georgia
Well Milroy managed to evade contact with the enemy but his command is in dire straights. Out of supply and more than a full turns march back to a supply base. In theory I can trace a route to his current position but I reckon he's out of effective supply. Its whether I lose any elements in the march back. I would not be surprised to loose at least a divisions worth of elements. If I do the only plus will be that the loss will not affect NM.
Alabama/Georgia
These then are my anticipated moves for the coming turn. I had initally intended for Hooker to march against Mobile once his troops had rested which they now have. Its taken
too long though. Look, Gardner has been reinforced by the arrival of a division commanded by Quantrill. It slipped past my outlying pickets early in the month. Hookers command is not strong enough attack the reinforced defences particularly in the unfavourable terrain that exists in the environs. He has thus been ordered to move to Sparta with supplies to meet up with the remenants of Milroys Corp. If I can salvage sufficient of that I might, just might, be able to attempt another assault on Atlanta before Banks can reinforce to any significant degree.
You will also note, just at the top of the picture, that I'm moving Sheridan southwards as fast as I can. He's still a distance away and his command less than a division strength but his presence in the Lower Seaboard theatre would be most welcome.
Well good people thats about it for another turn save for the odds and ends although given its the end of June orders the odds and ends are quite considerable. Time I think for a spot of breakfast so I'll post the bits and bobs in a while.
<Edit> Breakfast is over and so here are the final pieces of the Union jigsaw for the end of June.
Finances - 5% Bonds which should raise 600,000 at a cost of 25VP's
- Exceptional Taxes which should provide an income boost of 1,785,00 at a cost of 2NM's and a 1% increase in inflation.
Economy - 100 Rail and 25 River Transport
Drafts - Offering a 2,000 bounty and should raise 729 conscripts which will decrease NM by a further 1
Politics - Total Blockade which will raise 50,000 and produce an increase in NM of 1 plus a gain of 15 on VP's
Overall VP's down 10 and NM down 2 - under the circumstances not too bad.
NM currently stands at 140 for the Union against 91 for the CSA
VP's are 1725 for the Union and 1891 for the South.
Foreign intervention remains at minus 38
Replacements
2 Elite Infantry, 10 Line Infantry, 2 Field Artillery and 2 Supply
Reinforcements
Pennsylvania
10 Militia
2 x 2 Infantry and 1 Sharpshooter Brigades
New York
9 Zouaves Regiments
6 x 2 Infantry and 1 x 6lb Artillery Brigades
2 x 3 Infantry 1 x 6lb Artillery and 1 Cavalry Brigades
7 Cavalry Regiments
Iowa
3 Cavalry Regiments
Illinois
4 Militia
Wisconsin
4 x 2 Infantry and 1 x 6lb Artillery Brigades
Indiana
1 x 1 Infantry and 1 Sharpshooter Brigade
1 x 2 Infantry and 1 Cavalry Brigade
Anywhere
1 Marine Regiment
Now that is about it. As you can see its quite a build programme I'm embarking on. Its around this point of any human v human campaign game that (provided the Northern player makes no really daft errors and that the CSA players fails to bring off any truely stunning victories) the superiority of resources available to the North should really begin to bite.