maqwyn
Conscript
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:14 am

Marines and sailors

Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:14 pm

What exactly will a marine or a sailor in a stack do for the stack? My searches do not seem to do much, sorry.
Maqwyn
Invested all my money in wine women and fast horses, then just wasted the rest.

"It is a good thing war is so terrible or we should love it too much" Master Robert E Lee.

I also play as Murat.

Major Dilemma
Corporal
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 7:46 pm

Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:27 pm

They provide the pontooner skill to the whole stack, enabling faster river crossing.

maqwyn
Conscript
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:14 am

Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:36 pm

Thanks for the quick response. Do both offer the same skill or is a marine something different?
Maqwyn

Invested all my money in wine women and fast horses, then just wasted the rest.



"It is a good thing war is so terrible or we should love it too much" Master Robert E Lee.



I also play as Murat.

User avatar
Cdr. McBragg
Private
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:53 am

Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:43 pm

It's the same skill. Marines are just stronger in battle.

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:32 pm

There are som other subtle differences too; the sailors use line infantry replacements, while marines use elite infantry, and you can combine the sailor with a single-element line infantry unit :)
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE
Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[/CENTER]

maqwyn
Conscript
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:14 am

Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:38 pm

Thanks everyone. I see it pays to have at least one with your units with all the rivers. Historically I don't remember the engineers playing a large part in river crossings but units depending on bridges and fords. However even an old dog can learn new tricks. :bonk:
Maqwyn

Invested all my money in wine women and fast horses, then just wasted the rest.



"It is a good thing war is so terrible or we should love it too much" Master Robert E Lee.



I also play as Murat.

User avatar
Banks6060
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:51 pm

Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:39 pm

yeah...eventually it's ideal to have an engineer and sailor or marine unit with each of your Corps....especially as the Union (because you can afford it.)

However it's hard to find the money, manpower, and resources to use on these when there are so many more fun toys to play with :D .

User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:27 pm

Were sailors ever considered as a requirement for sailing the ships, then once recruited combined with the ship unit in order to set sail?

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:31 pm

No, ships have their own intrinsic manpower cost, representing the crews

(No need to make it more complicated than that :) )
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE

Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[/CENTER]

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

deleted

Major Dilemma
Corporal
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 7:46 pm

Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:22 am

Aside from faster rail repairs is there any benefit to including an engineer in your force?

maqwyn
Conscript
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:14 am

Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:10 am

I would think the would help with defenses, especially with earthworks and fortifications.
Maqwyn

Invested all my money in wine women and fast horses, then just wasted the rest.



"It is a good thing war is so terrible or we should love it too much" Master Robert E Lee.



I also play as Murat.

User avatar
soloswolf
General of the Army
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:49 am

Major Dilemma wrote:Aside from faster rail repairs is there any benefit to including an engineer in your force?


In their detailed profile, if you hover over their engineer symbol you will get a tool-tip detailing that they decrease the time it takes to achieve the next level of entrenchment.
My name is Aaron.

Knight of New Hampshire

Mangudai
Lieutenant
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:32 pm

Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:05 am

maqwyn wrote:Thanks everyone. I see it pays to have at least one with your units with all the rivers. Historically I don't remember the engineers playing a large part in river crossings but units depending on bridges and fords. However even an old dog can learn new tricks. :bonk:


Pontoon bridges played a very big role. Sherman was especially fond of his portable bridges in the wagon train. Grant's forces build miles of boardwalk through the swamps around Vicksburg. Banks force did some creative bridging and damming during the Red River campaign.

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:57 am

Gray_Lensman wrote:[SIZE="6"]Indeed![/size] :D (This was too good an opportunity to let pass!)

Been dying to do that, haven't you ;) :D
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE

Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[/CENTER]

dublish
Corporal
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:51 am

Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:02 pm

Mangudai wrote:Pontoon bridges played a very big role. Sherman was especially fond of his portable bridges in the wagon train. Grant's forces build miles of boardwalk through the swamps around Vicksburg. Banks force did some creative bridging and damming during the Red River campaign.


Banks' force did some creative losing during that campaign as well. ;)

Other good examples of the importance of pontoons: Burnside's attack on Fredericksburg was delayed for weeks because his pontoons weren't where they were supposed to be. Grant's bridge over the James allowed him to disengage and completely give Lee the slip prior to the siege of Petersburg.

Return to “AACW Strategy discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests