Awhile back I posted a statement about the use of replacements for legions in AJE being ahistorical.
I was told I was wrong that legions did use replacments.Here is an interesting link to a discussion on the subject
http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/17-roman-military-history-a-archaeology/316688-legion-reinforcements.html
I believe that the use of replacements in the 1st punic war isn't historical
Now don't get me wrong I love the game I play it and witp ae exclusively.
The number of battles fought[during the actual war there were only 3 set or pitched battles fought and 1 of them was fought in Africa under Regulas]
You can have that many battles in a year in game,but I agree that playing the war out historically would be boring mostly it was a war of sieges except for at sea
The discussion members opinion of dando-stephens has me thinking of rereading his books to get an idea about their criticisms.