richfed
Posts: 902
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Marion, North Carolina, USA
Contact: Website

Visual Suggestion For Charleston, SC

Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:28 pm

Much like what was done in the Norfolk, VA area a while back, I think a little shifting of the city /fort names around Charleston, SC might be in order so that they could be more easily seen in that congested area.

While you are at it, perhaps making ALL the objective cities more visually noticeable would be nice.

As always, a great game getting better!

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:43 am

Charleston and forts have been repositionned slightly for the next update.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
mikee64
Brigadier General
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:13 am
Location: Virginia
Contact: Website

Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:55 pm

Along these same lines of visuals: The town of Lumberton in region Robeson NC almost entirely blocks the destroyed rail network symbol there - only the upper right 1/4 or so of the symbol is visible. It is very easy to miss when doing a scan for rail damaged regions.
Mike

User avatar
mikee64
Brigadier General
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:13 am
Location: Virginia
Contact: Website

Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:56 pm

Here is a screenshot of the above BTW:
Attachments

[The extension bmp has been deactivated and can no longer be displayed.]


User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:42 am

slightly moved for the next update. thanks.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

Return to “Help to improve AACW!”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests