marquo
Lieutenant
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 12:16 am

USA lost this one...really? Winning is losing??

Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:05 pm

Really?? WAD?? I love this defeat...winning really is losing??

[ATTACH]33176[/ATTACH]
Attachments
I love this defeat.jpg

User avatar
Gray Fox
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:48 pm
Location: Englewood, OH

Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:09 pm

If the game mechanic determines that one side has had enough, then they withdraw from combat, and are "defeated" as far as the report is concerned.

I've had my side inflict three times as many casualties as they took and still been "defeated" even though I retained control of the city I was defending.
I'm the 51st shade of gray. Eat, pray, Charge!

marquo
Lieutenant
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 12:16 am

Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:13 pm

I love it when my opponent scores a pyrrhic victory of this magnitude; I'll take it everytime. :thumbsup:

User avatar
Captain_Orso
Posts: 5766
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:02 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:36 pm

Basically, the side which retreats from the battle is considered the loser, regardless of losses. It seems that Cheatham scored more cohesion loss than Grant, which might indicate why Grant retreated from the battle.
Image

User avatar
DrPostman
Posts: 3005
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:39 pm
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact: Website Facebook Twitter YouTube

Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:42 pm

"'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it', a United States major said today."
-- Peter Arnett, Bến Tre, Vietnam, 1968
"Ludus non nisi sanguineus"

Image

Return to “Civil War II”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests