User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Problem with March 62 Northern Papers Instructions

Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:33 pm

I am having some trouble deciphering a poorly worded phrase in the campaign game. This is the one having to do with the March 62 Northern Papers warning:

"Northern Papers Push for 1862 Offensive – 10 or more units within 2 regions of Richmond for two turns by end of June 62, or -10 NM"

I read this to mean: "10 or more units within 2 regions of Richmond for two turns SOMETIME BEFORE the end of June 62, or -10 NM"

but apparently what it really means is: "10 or more units within 2 regions of Richmond DURING TWO TURNS, ONE OF WHICH MUST BE THE LATE June 62 TURN, or -10 NM"

This is because I had units that met the conditions for FOUR turns between the Late March and Late May turns, but did not have them there on the Late June turn. In July, I was told I had not met the conditions, and I took the -10 hit.

Anyone else have a different interpretation or experience?

While I'm at it, is this a similar problem for the July Northern Papers warning?

User avatar
Ethan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Location: Gádir

Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:56 pm

I usually by that date, I have already captured Richmond or I'm very close to doing, so always I have many units in that area and I have no problem with that event.

I think that I have never lost 10 NM because of it. ;)
[color="Navy"][font="Georgia"]"Mi grandeza no reside en no haber caído nunca, sino en haberme levantado siempre". Napoleón Bonaparte.[/font][/color]

[color="Blue"]Same Land. Different Dreams. - Photobook[/color]

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:59 pm

deleted

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Tue Jul 05, 2011 12:05 am

Sorry you've misunderstood, Gray. I fulfilled the intent of the rule. I was there four turns. The rule is not clear that you must be there ON the Late June turn, it simply says be there for "2 turns BY the end of June." I was. I was there four turns. It's messed up, due to poor wording.

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Tue Jul 05, 2011 12:16 am

Ethan wrote:I usually by that date, I have already captured Richmond or I'm very close to doing, so always I have many units in that area and I have no problem with that event.

I think that I have never lost 10 NM because of it. ;)


This occurred in a PBEM game, where I think you'll find taking Richmond to be a bit more of a challenge! :mdr:

User avatar
Ethan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Location: Gádir

Tue Jul 05, 2011 12:33 am

You can be sure, buddy! :D

Regards! :thumbsup:
[color="Navy"][font="Georgia"]"Mi grandeza no reside en no haber caído nunca, sino en haberme levantado siempre". Napoleón Bonaparte.[/font][/color]



[color="Blue"]Same Land. Different Dreams. - Photobook[/color]



[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Oldman
Private
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:49 pm

Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:19 am

Just to be sure - you've had 10 separate units (brigades/batteries/divisions, etc) within those two regions?
Because there is common mistake of deploying, say, full corps with 4 divisions (made of some 20+ units) - but only 4 divisions count for the event purposes, not the total number batteries/brigades in them...

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:25 am

Oldman wrote:Just to be sure - you've had 10 separate units (brigades/batteries/divisions, etc) within those two regions?
Because there is common mistake of deploying, say, full corps with 4 divisions (made of some 20+ units) - but only 4 divisions count for the event purposes, not the total number batteries/brigades in them...


Thanks! Well that's a twist! Nope, I had a corps with several divisions - well beyond the requirement, but not if you count it that way. It's laughable! The NY Herald is irate about 3 divisions, but is fine with 10 brigades?!? :bonk:

Now I wonder if "within two regions of Richmond" means you're supposed to count the Richmond region as one of them, meaning you have to be adjacent.

So, to sum up:

.... nope, can't do it. Who knows what the author intended? It's as clear as Virginia mud.

At least the game is deep with complexity, to end by saying something positive.

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:50 am

deleted

User avatar
Ethan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Location: Gádir

Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:05 am

Good explanation, Gray. Maybe this picture will help to understand it better. :)
Attachments
Picture.jpg
[color="Navy"][font="Georgia"]"Mi grandeza no reside en no haber caído nunca, sino en haberme levantado siempre". Napoleón Bonaparte.[/font][/color]



[color="Blue"]Same Land. Different Dreams. - Photobook[/color]



[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:19 pm

Helpful and thorough explanation, so thanks, Gray. You have answered all my questions on this, as well as a few I might have had, had I been perspicacious enough to craft them.

If I implied there was something wrong with HAVING these rules/conditions, let me clarify: I do not. Their existence and purpose makes sense and they add great flavor and purpose to the game as well.

That the rule requires such an elaborate explanation may only mean that I am excessively dense, that I should improve the quality of my play to avoid the situation in the first place, or that a clearer means of accomplishing the same end could be had in another version, place, and time.

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:29 pm

Ethan wrote:Good explanation, Gray. Maybe this picture will help to understand it better. :)


I guess Camden (Burkeville) didn't make the cut even though it seems to be within two regions of Richmond. Not that it's a likely region to occupy anyway, other than as one of the two sources of rail supply to Richmond. Good to know now, rather than later!

User avatar
Jim-NC
Posts: 2981
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Location: Near Region 209, North Carolina

Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:35 pm

I find the easiest way to satisfy the requirement is to move Butler to Williamsburg with loose units in his stack.

I have also fulfilled the requirement by moving 10 generals into a region next to Richmond (in 10 different stacks). I was really desperate at the time to not lose 10 NM. :tournepas I don't recommend it.
Remember - The beatings will continue until morale improves.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:25 pm

deleted

User avatar
Ethan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Location: Gádir

Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:12 pm

Longshanks wrote: I guess Camden (Burkeville) didn't make the cut even though it seems to be within two regions of Richmond.


Yep, I didn't include Camden because it doesn't appear in the list. But you're right. ;) :thumbsup:
[color="Navy"][font="Georgia"]"Mi grandeza no reside en no haber caído nunca, sino en haberme levantado siempre". Napoleón Bonaparte.[/font][/color]



[color="Blue"]Same Land. Different Dreams. - Photobook[/color]



[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:22 pm

Jim-NC wrote:I have also fulfilled the requirement by moving 10 generals into a region next to Richmond (in 10 different stacks). I was really desperate at the time to not lose 10 NM. :tournepas I don't recommend it.


At last! McClellan can now actually accomplish something while sitting around waiting for more men!

User avatar
Ethan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Location: Gádir

Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:42 pm

Longshanks wrote:At last! McClellan can now actually accomplish something while sitting around waiting for more men!


:niark: :niark:...Don't be evil!


:thumbsup:
[color="Navy"][font="Georgia"]"Mi grandeza no reside en no haber caído nunca, sino en haberme levantado siempre". Napoleón Bonaparte.[/font][/color]



[color="Blue"]Same Land. Different Dreams. - Photobook[/color]



[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
GraniteStater
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1778
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:16 am
Location: Annapolis, MD - What?

Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:47 pm

To the tune of "Wouldn't it be Loverly", from My Fair Lady:

All I want is some men to spare,
Far away from a Rebel scare;
One troop,
One gun,
One Corps, that's fair,
Oh, wouldn't it
Be soldierly?

Just some recruits to march around,
Golly, gee, I could gain some ground,
One troop,
One gun,
One Corps I've found,
Oh, wouldn't it
Be soldierly?

Give me more, amd more, and more,
Not enough now to win the war,
One troop,
One gun,
One Corps in store,
Oh, wouldn't it
Be soldierly?
[color="#AFEEEE"]"Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!"[/color]
-Daniel Webster

[color="#FFA07A"]"C'mon, boys, we got the damn Yankees on the run!"[/color]
-General Joseph Wheeler, US Army, serving at Santiago in 1898

RULES
(A) When in doubt, agree with Ace.
(B) Pull my reins up sharply when needed, for I am a spirited thoroughbred and forget to turn at the post sometimes.


Image

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:58 pm

:thumbsup:

User avatar
George McClellan
Captain
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:38 pm
Location: " If you can make it here, you can make it anywhere!"

Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:51 am

Longshanks wrote:At last! McClellan can now actually accomplish something while sitting around waiting for more men!

...Anyway, moving on... :nuts:
George McClellan is locked in Cincinati until Lincoln admits he's a baboon.Image

User avatar
GraniteStater
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1778
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:16 am
Location: Annapolis, MD - What?

Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:24 pm

I'm trying to wrap my head around the words 'moving' and 'McClellan' in the same universe.
[color="#AFEEEE"]"Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!"[/color]

-Daniel Webster



[color="#FFA07A"]"C'mon, boys, we got the damn Yankees on the run!"[/color]

-General Joseph Wheeler, US Army, serving at Santiago in 1898



RULES

(A) When in doubt, agree with Ace.

(B) Pull my reins up sharply when needed, for I am a spirited thoroughbred and forget to turn at the post sometimes.





Image

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:00 pm

It's all relative.

McClellan's ego creates a heavy gravitational field (it's all about him, you see). From our perception, time moves more slowly in the presence of intense gravity and so he moves so very slowly. But in his little world, he's picking up the pace every second, and can't understand why we're all jumping about.

(Any physicists out there can correct me if needed.)

User avatar
Ethan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Location: Gádir

Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:16 pm

Longshanks wrote:It's all relative.

McClellan's ego creates a heavy gravitational field (it's all about him, you see). From our perception, time moves more slowly in the presence of intense gravity and so he moves so very slowly. But in his little world, he's picking up the pace every second, and can't understand why we're all jumping about.

(Any physicists out there can correct me if needed.)


:mdr: :mdr:
[color="Navy"][font="Georgia"]"Mi grandeza no reside en no haber caído nunca, sino en haberme levantado siempre". Napoleón Bonaparte.[/font][/color]



[color="Blue"]Same Land. Different Dreams. - Photobook[/color]



[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:30 am

I'm resurrecting this oldie to ask: Did Burksville's region finally get added to the list of acceptable regions to be in in order to fulfill the Northern Papers Offensive requirement? (You may recall that back when this post was made, it did not qualify even though it is within two regions of Richmond.)
Two Rules: 1. The Tournament Director is always right. 2. When the Tournament Director is wrong, see Rule 1.
Image

User avatar
lodilefty
Posts: 7616
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NY GMT -5 US Eastern

Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:01 pm

Longshanks wrote:I'm resurrecting this oldie to ask: Did Burksville's region finally get added to the list of acceptable regions to be in in order to fulfill the Northern Papers Offensive requirement? (You may recall that back when this post was made, it did not qualify even though it is within two regions of Richmond.)


It hadn't been added....

..until about 10 minutes ago :D
Always ask yourself: "Am I part of the Solution?" If you aren't, then you are part of the Problem!
[CENTER][/CENTER]
[CENTER]Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Rules for new members[/CENTER]
[CENTER]Forum Rules[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Help desk: support@slitherine.co.uk[/CENTER]

User avatar
Longshanks
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Fairfax Virginia

Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:31 pm

So...in next patch?
Thx!!!!
Two Rules: 1. The Tournament Director is always right. 2. When the Tournament Director is wrong, see Rule 1.

Image

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests