Hi folks, just played the ToryIndian scenario and I am confused about why the Brit scenario instructions say that you should maintain control of Oswego as one of the conditions to win the game, but Oswego is not an objective or a strategic town. Also the "rebel" scenario instructions don't even mention Oswego as an important location. Shouldn't the rebel player be
told that Oswego is an important target? Why is it not an objective?
Cheers, Chris
The one which was due yesterday?PhilThib wrote:hmm,
an oversight of ours...thanks for spotting. It will be corrected with next patch.
Henry D, also known as "Stauffenberg" @ Strategycon Interactive and formerly (un)known as "whatasillyname" @ Paradox Forums
"Rackers, wollt Ihr ewig leben?" (Rascals, Do You want to live forever?) - Frederick the Great, cursing at his fleeing Grenadiers at the battle of Kunersdorf
"Nee, Fritze, aber für fuffzehn Pfennije is' heute jenuch!" (No, Freddy, but for 15p let's call it a day!) - Retort of one passing Grenadier to the above
"Rackers, wollt Ihr ewig leben?" (Rascals, Do You want to live forever?) - Frederick the Great, cursing at his fleeing Grenadiers at the battle of Kunersdorf
"Nee, Fritze, aber für fuffzehn Pfennije is' heute jenuch!" (No, Freddy, but for 15p let's call it a day!) - Retort of one passing Grenadier to the above
Hobbes wrote:Hi folks, just played the ToryIndian scenario and I am confused about why the Brit scenario instructions say that you should maintain control of Oswego as one of the conditions to win the game, but Oswego is not an objective or a strategic town. Also the "rebel" scenario instructions don't even mention Oswego as an important location. Shouldn't the rebel player be
told that Oswego is an important target? Why is it not an objective?
Cheers, Chris
Victory conditions text corrected in 1.07.
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests