Jagger
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 949
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:31 pm

Attack/Defense leadership values

Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:35 pm

When divisions are in a corps within army command range, which leaders (army, corps, division) will apply their attack/defense modifiers to the brigades/regiments within the division during combat?

Are the combat modifiers from all leaders within the command chain totalled or is it only the corps commander?

Basically, does the division commander stats matter once within a corps?

User avatar
McNaughton
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:51 pm

Well, based on obervations, the leaders who have higher attack/defence ratings tend to have more powerful divisions than those without. Stick a leader with 3-1-1 stats in command of a division, and one with 3-3-3, and the division 'power' number is significantly greater. The way I vew things, divisions are like little corps. They are affected by their divisional commander, then the stack itself is affected by the Corps commander (who is himself affected by Army commander).

So, I would say it is important to have leaders with high levels commanding divisions.

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:57 pm

Army commanders may give a bonus or a penalty to their corps commanders, based on the army commander's ratings.

In combat, a unit benefits 5% per rating point from the corps commander, while the division commander provides 3% per rating point.

So, as McNaughton says, it is important to have good division commanders, but it is more important to have good corps/stack commanders :)
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE
Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[/CENTER]

User avatar
runyan99
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:34 am

Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:03 pm

What does not seem to matter is the strategic rating of a division commander who is part of a corps. Only the corps commander's strategic rating is used, so I guess a 4-1-1 is as good for division command as a 2-1-1.

So, I tend to pull out the 4-1-1 type guys and use them for independent cavalry leaders and such.

Jagger
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 949
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:31 pm

Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:08 pm

runyan99 wrote:What does not seem to matter is the strategic rating of a division commander who is part of a corps. Only the corps commander's strategic rating is used, so I guess a 4-1-1 is as good for division command as a 2-1-1.

So, I tend to pull out the 4-1-1 type guys and use them for independent cavalry leaders and such.


I am thinking the same thing but they also would make good Aides de Camp.

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests