Post Reply
User avatar
Heldenkaiser
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:32 pm
Contact: Website

Army Command CP Cost

Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:46 pm

This may sound odd, but until the most recent patch I had never noticed that army HQs (consisting, as they do, only of a single artillery battery) carry a CP cost of 4. Has this always been the case? Is it logical? That an army commander needs the CP equivalent of a full division of 18 units just to "command" himself and his staff? :confused:
[color="Gray"]"These Savages may indeed be a formidable Enemy to your raw American Militia, but, upon the King's regular & disciplined Troops, Sir, it is impossible they should make any Impression." -- General Edward Braddock[/color]
Colonial Campaigns Club (supports BoA and WiA)
[color="Gray"]"... and keep moving on." -- General U.S. Grant[/color]
American Civil War Game Club (supports AACW)
User avatar
Mickey3D
Posts: 1569
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:14 pm

Heldenkaiser wrote:Has this always been the case? Is it logical? That an army commander needs the CP equivalent of a full division of 18 units just to "command" himself and his staff? :confused:


As far as I remember it has been the case (but I'm not playing AACW since the beginning).

Is it logical ? I suppose it's a way to simulate the burden of administrating a huge structure as an army.
User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:09 pm

deleted
User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:01 am

Happy to see you back Michael :)

Yes, this cost was always there, to reduce the interest into adding too much reserve into the army stack itself (uber stack)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."
User avatar
Heldenkaiser
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:32 pm
Contact: Website

Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:40 pm

Pocus wrote:Happy to see you back Michael :)

Yes, this cost was always there, to reduce the interest into adding too much reserve into the army stack itself (uber stack)


I see. It's only a real problem when you have armies, but no corps, like in 1861.
[color="Gray"]"These Savages may indeed be a formidable Enemy to your raw American Militia, but, upon the King's regular & disciplined Troops, Sir, it is impossible they should make any Impression." -- General Edward Braddock[/color]

Colonial Campaigns Club (supports BoA and WiA)

[color="Gray"]"... and keep moving on." -- General U.S. Grant[/color]

American Civil War Game Club (supports AACW)
Post Reply

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests