So...how can the USA really "win" the 1861 Manassas event to avoid a -10 NM hit when up against an entrenched Bory (4-2-5) and Longstreet (5-3-6 & a 231pwr) and 3 other CSA generals and forces that just never seem to lose cohesion or men? After 2 major battles and I haven't even dented the Manassas force, only thrown the men to their slaughter. It's a PBEM btw.
If I chose to stick to my own agenda and ignore the political pressure, I will lose 10NM, If I try and take Manassas and lose, I will end up losing 10NM anyway and probably more because of the loss of men in battles. All of this only to help the CSA improve their best leadership. So bottom line, it doesn't matter if it's McDowell or McClellen there at Manassas, USA loses 10NM.
What is a solid USA strategy that's not gamey to "win" the 1861 Manassas event?
(What I mean by gamey is to attempt to take Manassas early with the minimal USA forces that you get early in the game. Some players feel that is gamey, I tend to think that way, but compared to the alternative of facing an entrenched CSA force like the one above and not calling that gamey is argueable just like allowing the USA to "sit and wait")
I guess it's possible for the USA to win this event, I just don't know how.