User avatar
GenJackson
Private
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:58 pm

Confederacy Blockade/Shipping Box

Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:08 am

So, I've gotten the idea down fairly well about the Shipping and Blockade Boxes, i.e. how they work and what happens if you send ships into them. But, I was wondering two things:

1) Is it possible for the Confederacy to blockade the Union? What happens if you send heavy warships (as the Confederacy) into the Blockade Box instead of the brig Blockade runners.

2) Can the Confederacy ever have Ocean Transport points? I loaded a sample game as the Union and saw the Shipping Box was FULL of transports. What happens if you do this as the Confederacy? Do you get the ocean transport points in addition to the rail and river points? (I read somewhere that you don't)

Thanks as always!

User avatar
deguerra
Major
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:20 am

Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:46 am

Hi GenJackson,

I'm far from an expert, but I believe the answer to be "You can't" to both your questions. No blockading for the South, and no ocean shipping points.

User avatar
GenJackson
Private
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:58 pm

Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:53 am

That would be an interesting twist if the Confederate Navy ever became so large that it could start blockading northern ports. But, yes, I believe I've read in a few places the Confederate Player isn't able to do that in the game.

User avatar
Fingolfin
Corporal
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:54 pm
Location: Tours, France

Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:12 am

AFAIK, CSA can both transport supply and blockade USA with its ships in Union shipping box.
« Mon Dieu, Sire, je n'ai vraiment rien fait pour cela, c'est quelque chose d'inexplicable que j'ai en moi et qui porte malheur aux gouvernements qui me négligent. » Talleyrand à Louis XVIII, le 1er Mai 1814

User avatar
Mickey3D
Posts: 1569
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

Tue Apr 05, 2011 4:47 pm

Fingolfin wrote:AFAIK, CSA can both transport supply and blockade USA with its ships in Union shipping box.


CSA can't blockade USA (i.e. reduce by a certain % the northern production) but can attack US ships and thus lower income US received with them.

User avatar
Citizen X
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 796
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:34 pm

Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:06 pm

As tactical options for the CSA, in all the boxes do apply normal sea encounter rules.

As economic options for the CSA there would be: generating income by putting blockade runners into the blockade boxes and/or lowering income for the US by putting a fleet into the shipping box. The cost effectiveness of such a fleet varies much, depending on it's composition. You don't need to actually find Union ships. Try out yourself ;)

As a strategic option the CSA can put transports into the shipping box to generate supply transportation.

On the long run investing into ships as CSA makes sense only if you also have a brownwater plan and an overall economic plan. Otherwise everything that tops 10-12 squadrons of briggs in each blockade box is wasted resources IMHO.

User avatar
Cromagnonman
Brigadier General
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:46 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:08 am

As the Union, I have never seen a dent put in my productivity due to CSN actions. The only time I started getting messages that Union merchantmen had been sunk, and resources thereby lost, was when the FI navies started sending serious warships into the shipping box. Even then, I found the Box profitable. I've never had an actual element eliminated in any of the shipping boxes, though I did have to bring the occasional blockade squadron back for repairs and rearmament.
"firstest with the mostest"

"I fights mit Sigel"

User avatar
TheDoctorKing
Posts: 1664
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Portland Oregon

Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:10 am

I wonder about this myself. The game is reporting to the CSA player that he sank ships worth x money and y WS each turn. But the USA player almost never gets a message that he has lost a ship. I think what's going on is that the money and WS is being transparently deducted from the USA stock without him being made aware of this fact by the game. Otherwise, there's a bug somewhere. But I think that you don't have to actually destroy a USA ship to have some effect on USA production.

Putting ships (brigs, nothing else will work) in the blockade boxes gives the CSA a regular, small flow of money and WS. These ships will have to be brought back to port from time to time to peen out the dents and reorganize. I've never seen one of them get sunk.
Stewart King

"There is no substitute for victory"

Depends on how you define victory.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Pat "Stonewall" Cleburne
General of the Army
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Kentucky

Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:24 am

TheDoctorKing wrote:I wonder about this myself. The game is reporting to the CSA player that he sank ships worth x money and y WS each turn. But the USA player almost never gets a message that he has lost a ship. I think what's going on is that the money and WS is being transparently deducted from the USA stock without him being made aware of this fact by the game. Otherwise, there's a bug somewhere. But I think that you don't have to actually destroy a USA ship to have some effect on USA production.

Putting ships (brigs, nothing else will work) in the blockade boxes gives the CSA a regular, small flow of money and WS. These ships will have to be brought back to port from time to time to peen out the dents and reorganize. I've never seen one of them get sunk.


I think the sank x and y amount of ships is the CSA way of saying what the blockade %'s say for the union. I might try to test this sometime soon.

User avatar
Mickey3D
Posts: 1569
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:46 am

lowering income for the US by putting a fleet into the shipping box.


Given the production capacity of the north, lowering the income provided by the fleet is just a mosquito bite ;)

Moreover in a PBEM there will be other more important priorities.

User avatar
Cromagnonman
Brigadier General
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:46 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:47 am

Pat "Stonewall" Cleburne wrote:I think the sank x and y amount of ships is the CSA way of saying what the blockade %'s say for the union. I might try to test this sometime soon.


It had been proposed that the amount brought home by Union shipping is lower when there are enemy warships in the Shipping Box. However, the observations I made showed no difference in returns regardless of the presence or absence of commerce raiders.

While the USA is quite productive, I've found that putting a few dozen transports in the Box delivered a fairly good return on investment, roughly $1/WS per ship per turn on the 75% setting. $20-40 can mean an extra brigade, ship, or battery every turn, and it's something like a 5-10% boost to production (depending on NM etc).
"firstest with the mostest"



"I fights mit Sigel"

User avatar
GenJackson
Private
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:58 pm

Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:01 am

Thanks for all the great info. Once thing I am still confused about are Ocean Transport Points. I've read in a few places its impossible for the CSA to ever have any. Is this true? I loaded a Union game once, just to see what it looked like, and found the Shipping box full of transports - apparently the source of the ocean points. Could the CSA do this as well?

User avatar
Ol' Choctaw
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:13 pm

Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:37 am

No

Not even if you drive the Union form the seas.

The difference is hard coded into the game. Union can’t use blockade runners and the CSA can’t get sea transport.

MarkCSA
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: In a safe place, they couldn't hit an elephant at this distance

Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:10 pm

Ol' Choctaw wrote:No

Not even if you drive the Union form the seas.

The difference is hard coded into the game. Union can’t use blockade runners and the CSA can’t get sea transport.


IIRC Naval Supply *was* added for the CSA in one of the latest patches to be able to effectively supply FI Armies. Whether it is available before that (FI), I have no clue, as I never (need to) use it.

Best use of the boxes as CSA (I only play CSA): Build fleets of 4 x Steam Frigate and 2 x Normal Frigate and send them into the Shipping box, led by Semmes. I've been able to sink 100+ $ and WS combo (so both of them add up to a figure higher than 100) *per turn* . I have no clue what Union income is, but that has to make a dent in their bottom line (and I see them printing money to compensate).

The only tricky part it is that:

A) Union must have Transports in the box for this to work

B) There is some kind of check performed (I have yet to figure out how this works, if anyone can enlighten me, much appreciated) to see if your guys 'connect' and sink shipping.

Hope this helps!
Murphy's Law of Combat: 'The most dangerous thing on a battlefield? An officer with a map'

User avatar
GenJackson
Private
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:58 pm

William Harwar Parker

Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:46 am

A shame the Confederacy doesn't have more Admiral characters. A *great* addition would be the character of William Harwar Parker. Although only a Captain, he was one of the more interesting Confederate Naval officers

User avatar
Ol' Choctaw
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:13 pm

Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:47 am

The CSA only made the two Admirals but they had a number of Commodores which was the equivalent of a Rear Admiral or at least a Brigadier General as it is higher than Colonel.

I wonder also why the Hunly? They also built a couple of other Submarines that were steam powered called Davids and the Union also built the submarine USS Alligator. It was the product of French inventor Brutus De Villeroi.

It was cut lose during a storm of Cape Hatteris while being towed to Charleston so no one knows where it sank.

User avatar
GenJackson
Private
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:58 pm

Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Does the Hunley appear in the simulator?? I was wondering about that.

MarkCSA
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: In a safe place, they couldn't hit an elephant at this distance

Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:51 am

GenJackson wrote:Does the Hunley appear in the simulator?? I was wondering about that.


Yes, but it always sinks in an event and costs you War Materials (Supplies?... can't think of the term for some reason) and some general supplies I think.

One thing I forgot to mention, by beating up the Transports in the Shipping Box, you also force them to leave once in a while (and they usually move the entire fleet), cutting off all Union naval supply. Extremely handy when mopping up rogue stacks.
Murphy's Law of Combat: 'The most dangerous thing on a battlefield? An officer with a map'

User avatar
W.Barksdale
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 916
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:17 pm
Location: UK

Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:55 pm

GenJackson wrote:1) Is it possible for the Confederacy to blockade the Union? What happens if you send heavy warships (as the Confederacy) into the Blockade Box instead of the brig Blockade runners.


Don't bother. In fact, don't build heavy ocean warships as CSA. The ones you get by event are enough. Those resources are much better used elsewhere...Think artillery...Maybe ironclads if the game dictates.

GenJackson wrote:2) Can the Confederacy ever have Ocean Transport points? I loaded a sample game as the Union and saw the Shipping Box was FULL of transports. What happens if you do this as the Confederacy? Do you get the ocean transport points in addition to the rail and river points? (I read somewhere that you don't)

This is really only an issue if you have FI. I think Gray fixed this a ways back so that CSA has them. Only build ocean transports as csa if you need a cheap depot on the coast.
"Tell General Lee that if he wants a bridge of dead Yankees I can furnish him with one."
-General William Barksdale at Fredericksburg

User avatar
OneArmedMexican
General
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:14 pm

Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:29 am

W.Barksdale wrote:This is really only an issue if you have FI. I think Gray fixed this a ways back so that CSA has them. Only build ocean transports as csa if you need a cheap depot on the coast.


It can get an issue in other circumstances, too: In my last campaign as CSA I captured four US transport while taking Fort Picken.

It turned out these transports were completly useless to my war effort: If I am not mistaken, they didn't add to my blockade running capacity. At least, I didn't notice any measurable increase in war supplies or money (bug?). The CSA can't get ocean transport points. It is in no position to launch amphibious assaults (unless FI happens). In short, those transport are good for nothing except building depots in coastal cities (which is rarely the place depots are lacking).

Return to “AACW Strategy discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests