User avatar
Moltke
Conscript
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:57 pm

meat grinder strategy

Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:19 pm

How best to lure an aggressive enemy into attacking your defensive positions while at the same time ensuring that he will suffer catastrophic losses?

That is, what is the best composition of a defensive position?

User avatar
Jabberwock
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:12 am
Location: Weymouth, MA
Contact: ICQ

Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:48 pm

I tried this in 1.03, it seemed to work pretty well:

Huger's Corps - stationed in Winchester for most of the war.
11th Division:
David Alexander
1 regiment elite infantry
1 regiment sharpshooters
15 regiments field artillery

other divisions added on an ad hoc basis.
[color="DimGray"] You deserve to be spanked[/color]

Image

Adam the VIth
Lieutenant
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Pennsylvania Indian Country

Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:40 am

15 artillery? Interesting idea.

Do you get double the artillerist bonus because of both corps and division commander?

Can this force be steam-rolled? Or does it drive down morale of opposing forces before they can do much damage?

User avatar
Jabberwock
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:12 am
Location: Weymouth, MA
Contact: ICQ

Fri Jun 15, 2007 3:07 am

1. I don't know about the bonus, but it seemed to work.
2. I would assume so, but it would have to be by a cav corps. Athena never tried that.
[color="DimGray"] You deserve to be spanked[/color]



Image

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:01 am

15 artilleries "don't fit" in the terrain matrix, ie you won't have the 15 firing at once during a given round. You are allowed to use in a given round an amount of line elements and another amount of support elements, so you would do better in adding more line elements, which will also protect your artilleries in case of need.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
sval06
Captain
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:46 pm

Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:16 am

Pocus wrote:15 artilleries "don't fit" in the terrain matrix, ie you won't have the 15 firing at once during a given round. You are allowed to use in a given round an amount of line elements and another amount of support elements, so you would do better in adding more line elements, which will also protect your artilleries in case of need.


I know it, but please Pocus, stop giving advices to potential PBEM opponents :niark: :siffle:

User avatar
Jabberwock
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:12 am
Location: Weymouth, MA
Contact: ICQ

Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:29 am

Thank You, Pocus.

BTW - I just recounted. It was 14 Artillery + Leader + Division + Sharpshooter + Elite
[color="DimGray"] You deserve to be spanked[/color]



Image

Adam the VIth
Lieutenant
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Pennsylvania Indian Country

Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:54 pm

Pocus wrote:15 artilleries "don't fit" in the terrain matrix, ie you won't have the 15 firing at once during a given round. You are allowed to use in a given round an amount of line elements and another amount of support elements, so you would do better in adding more line elements, which will also protect your artilleries in case of need.


Even if they are in a divisional container? (I assume it doesn't matter, but just curious).

User avatar
Jabberwock
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:12 am
Location: Weymouth, MA
Contact: ICQ

Sat Jun 16, 2007 3:01 am

OK, tried it again as the North using 1.04a. 9 field artillery + 1 elite + 1 sharpshooter + 5 line infantry. Had a great fight at Fredericksburg. I won but with 27K casualties (Lee had 21K + 6600 captured). He lost 2 divisions, I lost 1. Victory Union. Guess which division I lost. They got completely steamrolled.
[color="DimGray"] You deserve to be spanked[/color]



Image

Return to “AACW Strategy discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests