User avatar
rickd79
Colonel
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Connecticut

Darius Couch

Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:53 pm

Darius Couch:

USA Darius N. Couch ldr_USA_Couch NULL NULL NULL NULL 7 10 1 22 General 1 NULL 2 2 2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_N._Couch

Couch commanded the Federal II Corps at Fredricksburg and Chancellorsville, so you may want to add a Corps Commander entry for him. He didn't get along well with Hooker, and must have been extremely frustrated with the Army of the Potomac's performance in the previous fights, and as a result requested reassignment. However, Couch seems to have been considered a solid commander whose talents were wasted sitting on the sideline, and he shows up again in the Western Theater as a division commander in 1864/1865.

User avatar
marecone
Posts: 1530
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:44 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:13 pm

After reading wiki entry on him I got under impression that he was above average commander at least.
Traits suggested:
0 Militiaman Discipline bonus of 1, Cohesion bonus of 10 to all Militas in the stack.
Militia under his command played a strategic role during the 1863 Gettysburg Campaign in delaying the advance of Confederate troops from the Army of Northern Virginia and denying them passage across the critical Susquehanna River.


20 Engineer Provides a one point siege bonus to the whole stack when defending or attacking forts.
Fort Couch in Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, was constructed under Couch's direction and was named in his honor.


I am leaving his numbers to rest of you. Maybe something like 4|3|3. I dunno

User avatar
rickd79
Colonel
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Connecticut

Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:34 pm

That seems fair...I like the Militiaman idea...although someone else did mention that we seem to be bit liberal throwing around the "engineer" trait.

I would recommend:

USA Darius N. Couch ldr_USA_Couch $Militiaman NULL NULL NULL 7 10 1 22 General 1 NULL 4 3 3

User avatar
rickd79
Colonel
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Connecticut

Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:36 pm

And maybe a point lower on strategic rating as a Corps commander? Any thoughts?

USA Darius N. Couch ldr_USA_Couch2 $Militiaman NULL NULL NULL 7 10 1 22 General 1 NULL 3 3 3

User avatar
Korrigan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1982
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: France

Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:39 pm

USA Darius N. Couch ldr_USA_Couch2 $Militiaman NULL NULL NULL 7 10 1 22 General 1 NULL 3 2 2
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." Mark Twain

Image

User avatar
IronBrigadeYankee
Major
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Loudoun County, Virginia
Contact: AOL

Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:03 pm

I think her certainly deserves the militiaman trait, although engineer is stretching a little. I also say keep his stats at 4|3|3 for a division commander, but maybe a 3|3|3 as a corps commander - solid, but nothing too exciting. Comments?
"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."

-Thomas Paine

User avatar
Korrigan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1982
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: France

Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:13 pm

3-1-1 is average, 3-2-2 is solid but not exciting, 3-3-3 is really good, with 4 you are already in uncommon leaders, 5 is exceptionnal (no more than an handfull of such leaders in the whole war), 6 is genius (1 or 2 for each carac).
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." Mark Twain



Image

Chris0827
General
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Florida

Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:32 pm

I agree with 3|2|2. I see him as slightly better than average.

User avatar
IronBrigadeYankee
Major
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Loudoun County, Virginia
Contact: AOL

Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:10 am

Korrigan wrote:3-1-1 is average, 3-2-2 is solid but not exciting, 3-3-3 is really good, with 4 you are already in uncommon leaders, 5 is exceptionnal (no more than an handfull of such leaders in the whole war), 6 is genius (1 or 2 for each carac).


Sorry, 3-2-2 is what i meant :D
"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."



-Thomas Paine

Return to “Officers room”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests