Robert E. Rodes

[rickd79]

Robert E. Rodes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Rodes

168 CSA Robert E. Rodes ldr_CSA_Rodes2 NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 5 2 25 General 1 NULL 5 2 2
204 CSA Robert E. Rodes ldr_CSA_Rodes NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 1 1 31 General 1 NULL 5 2 2

1. I would drop his strategic to "3"...As a division commander he didn't exactly set the world on fire at Chancellorsville and Gettysburg. His uncoordinated assaults at Day 1 of Gettysburg resulted in 2 brigades getting chewed to pieces (although much of the blame lies with the brigade commanders who went in without skirmishers, resulting in a nasty suprise from the 2nd Division of the Federal I Corps)
2. Other than that, I'm happy with the stats....I can't see any special traits that apply....maybe "Reckless"

[frank7350]

pre war he was a civil eng for one of the rr's. that could figure in somewhere...

i believe lee et al, loved him... thought he was talented.... that said, i'm ok with a 3/2/2, or even a 3/2/3.

[Chris0827]

He did very well as a brigade commander and at chancellorsville but was a big disapointment at Gettysburg and after.