User avatar
BigDuke66
General
Posts: 526
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:06 pm

Total Blockade is confusing me too

Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:25 am

The "Total Blockade" option states that I gain "50k dollars, 15 victory points & 1 moral point" but my balance shows +50k dollars, -15 victory points & -1 moral point when I use the option.

So what is correct, the description or the balance???
(Using 1.15)
"Spread word to every slave, that even the mighty republic bleeds when struck!"
Join the Napoleonic Wargame Club
Join the American Civil War Game Club
Join the The Blitz Wargaming Club

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:30 am

deleted

User avatar
BigDuke66
General
Posts: 526
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:06 pm

Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:11 pm

Here they are.

I'm not sure if the balance is really right as the next turn shows me 103 VP & 88 MP.
Turn 1 started with 50VP & 85MP.
So 50+38(from cities)+15(Total Blockade)=103, and thats what I get in the next turn.
Moral points don't fit but 85+1(Sumter)+1(Total Blockade)=87, I don't know where that last point comes from.
Attachments
CH.rar
(408.59 KiB) Downloaded 275 times
"Spread word to every slave, that even the mighty republic bleeds when struck!"
Join the Napoleonic Wargame Club
Join the American Civil War Game Club
Join the The Blitz Wargaming Club

enf91
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:25 pm

Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:09 pm

I think I know what's confusing you, and it is a display error as Gray said. When you GAIN NM and VP, negative signs appear in front of them when you check your "predicted balance" in the reinforcements/replacements screens. If, however, you LOSE NM and VP due to drafts, taxes, or concessions, they appear as positive numbers on those screens. Ignore them; you are in fact gaining, as you discovered.
As for that mystery NM, if your NM is lower than 90 or higher than 110, your NM changes by 1 pt/turn towards 100. It's a measure of "resiliency", but I think you have to control your capital for it to work.

Peissner
Conscript
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:12 am

Double-negative?

Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:12 pm

I think what is confusing everybody is the negative sign. If something costs -1 then that means you gain 1. (A double-negative, right?)

Cost 1 means you lose 1.
Cost -1 means you gain 1.

If that's not true then I am really confused...

enf91
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:25 pm

Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:44 pm

I think I know what's confusing you, and it is a display error as Gray said. When you GAIN NM and VP, negative signs appear in front of them when you check your "predicted balance" in the reinforcements/replacements screens. If, however, you LOSE NM and VP due to drafts, taxes, or concessions, they appear as positive numbers on those screens. Ignore them; you are in fact gaining, as you discovered.
As for that mystery NM, if your NM is lower than 90 or higher than 110, your NM changes by 1 pt/turn towards 100. It's a measure of "resiliency", but I think you have to control your capital for it to work.

User avatar
nemethand
Colonel
Posts: 315
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Budapest

Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:03 pm

enf91 wrote:As for that mystery NM, if your NM is lower than 90 or higher than 110, your NM changes by 1 pt/turn towards 100. It's a measure of "resiliency", but I think you have to control your capital for it to work.


Thanks for that, enf91. :hat:
I was wondering about the same in an ongoing PBEM...

User avatar
Chaplain Lovejoy
Brigadier General
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:20 am
Location: Fairfield, OH (near Cincinnati)

Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:57 pm

In some cases, the NM definitely goes the wrong way, as documented previously (the Trent affair in particular).

User avatar
BigDuke66
General
Posts: 526
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:06 pm

Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:29 pm

Well if the descriptions are wrong I guess it can easily fixed but if the balance shows something wrong I guess that will be more complicated.

I know 1.15 is that last patch but any chance that we see a 1.16 in the future to fix stuff that is still left?
This problem is nothing that breaks the game but overall I think it's important that descriptions, balance and results are fitting as it gives a lot of uncertainty on what to rely if something steps out of the line.
"Spread word to every slave, that even the mighty republic bleeds when struck!"
Join the Napoleonic Wargame Club
Join the American Civil War Game Club
Join the The Blitz Wargaming Club

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:35 pm

deleted

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest