Gray_Lensman wrote:Also, explains why some gamers are maxing out the size of their CSA armies, since they are not spending anything on supply networks.
Yes that can be a reason.
As conscripts are so limited, seems better for supply to upgrade Rail / River Assets to 3/3, as these just cost Money & WS. The same goes for Industrialization.
Perhaps these should cost some conscripts, as commented in some threads.
However, I read some time ago than lots of slaves were in fact deployed as army support... (i.e. wagons for me)
Just spreading or moving your Wagons in corps on -non depot- areas (and hoping capture some of the enemys

) can do the job for a while, until too much fronts are opened, then CSA starts breaking his lines.
Again, just following the historical path is not a good option. Translating to game-terms Did CSA invested too much in Wagons and too little in Transport assets.?
I confirm myself on the game doing it the other way has best results on average.
About adding DEPOTS for CSA, I believe it is ok as it is... i.e perhaps do not add more supply advantages for CSA.
+ The problem with the 3rd bde can be easily solved either moving to the city or just reducing a turn the lock status.
+ The problem with johnston could be partially solved if just adding a small city. It could allow for troops geting at least 70% power before unlock, instead of 50% actually.
However... I ve found a couple times all this army being wiped out if send to manasas once unlocked.