User avatar
Dixicrat
General
Posts: 523
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:55 pm
Location: East Tennessee
Contact: ICQ

Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:21 pm

ShovelHead wrote:Has any thought been given to modeling the 12-,24- and 32-pound Howitzers?


Yes. The question to be resolved is whether the models can be designed to exploit the unique advantages of Howitzers, while providing a model which isn't just a minor variation of ordnance already in the game. Currently, we're experimenting with the idea of enhancing the "protection" value of Howitzers, to reflect their ability to fire from defilade positions.

For readers who don't know, the major difference between Howitzers and cannon is that Howitzers usually fire at a much higher arc than cannons do, using a lower charge of gunpowder.

ShovelHead wrote:Their use in the field was much more prevelent than the 'heavies'. The main difference between the howitzers and guns is the howitzers had a shorter range, but were just as effective (if not more) than guns at short range.


The purpose of Heavy Artillery was to defend and attack fortifications. That's what we're working toward. Most Heavy Artillery will be static, in point defense roles. Moving Heavy Artillery will be difficult, as you'll see.

ShovelHead wrote:I assume the 3-inch Ordnance rifle (Wrought Iron Rifle) is modeled as the 10-lb Parrott. It was the most widely used rifled cannon during the war.


It's easy to make this assumption, but this assumption is incorrect. The 10 lb Parrott models only the 10 lb Parrott. But you'll probably be happy to know that we're working on a 3" Ordnance Rifle model, too. :)
[SIZE="3"]Regards,[/size]
Dixicrat

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Basic Training for AACW newcomers

User avatar
ShovelHead
Sergeant
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Huntington Beach, California

Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:35 pm

Dixicrat wrote:The purpose of Heavy Artillery was to defend and attack fortifications. That's what we're working toward. Most Heavy Artillery will be static, in point defense roles. Moving Heavy Artillery will be difficult, as you'll see.


Are these not currently modelled with the Fort Batteries?

Dixicrat wrote:It's easy to make this assumption, but this assumption is incorrect. The 10 lb Parrott models only the 10 lb Parrott. But you'll probably be happy to know that we're working on a 3" Ordnance Rifle model, too. :)


I believe the Federals made more Model 1861 3-inch Ordnance Rifle cannons than Model 1861 2.9-in and Model 1863 3-in Parrotts combined.

User avatar
Dixicrat
General
Posts: 523
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:55 pm
Location: East Tennessee
Contact: ICQ

Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:22 pm

ShovelHead wrote:Are these not currently modelled with the Fort Batteries?


Yes, but Fort Batteries are designed to reflect enplaced batteries in barbettes, or on casemate mounts. That's why most Fort Batteries are locked.

The realigned C/R won't be locked, since they'll be modeling "Siege and Garrison" ordnance which were on iron and wooden carraiges, rather than casemates. Consequently, you'll be able to move them. Even so, their weight, movement coefficient, and possibly other factors will tend to make moving them a real hassle.

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests