Pocus wrote:I think it is fair that in a PBEM when you manage to get a major country into an alliance, you control it directly... To be decided before game starts obviously. Or you can play with AI max bonuses and hope that it will compensate AI blunders.
Field Marshal Hotzendorf wrote:Any plans to raid any of northern or southern France to distract the French and maybe relieve a little pressure on Austria?
Pocus wrote:Elite units cost 3 replacements in practice, to replace one loss. Regular, two replacements, militia only one.
You can disband units to get back 75% of their conscripts and 25% their war supplies, it cost VP though.
I think it is fair that in a PBEM when you manage to get a major country into an alliance, you control it directly... To be decided before game starts obviously. Or you can play with AI max bonuses and hope that it will compensate AI blunders.
veji1 wrote:But could you confirm for example that MTSG between allies doesn't work as well (or at all) ? For example to me it would make sense for MTSG between allies to be a national modifier : with time the Prussians, Austrians, Russians, British and co will be able to coordinate and MTSG so that scenarios like Leipzig or Waterloo become possible. But for at least the first few years of the GC, MTSG between allies should be non existent : Austerlitz after all would be emulated by having the russian and austrian stacks sitting together in the same province and moving together (ploddingly if I may say so).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests