H Gilmer3 wrote:I got the USA in October of 1916. But it took a little for the existing units to unlock and it took even longer for all the units I bought.
Historically the US Army was not ready to fight when they entered the war. First they had to study with the French and British armies in the Field as well as with training organisations in the rear. Then they determined the Tables of Establishments they would use etc. It was only after the first few months that US Forces slowly started shipping to Europe (there was not enough US shipping either which caused more delay). Then those units went into prolonged training in France. In the meantime the French and British got a bit annoyed and offered that US units should be fed by battalion or even company into existing French or British units for the following few months to gain experience and alleviate the Western Entente's dire need for replacements. Somewhat understandably the US refused and it took a few more months before US units were used in quiet sectors of the front. One thing that great spead up the deployment of US troops to Europe was the decision to ship them with very little equipment and draw on French or British stores once arrived in France...
In short, it took several months for the US Army to be a battle ready force. I wonder how it's with US generals in EAW. A good way to represent the slow growth of the US Army might be not to give them any leaders for the first half year, then add a few 2-stars and only later 3-stars. So at first they'd have to fight under different Western Entente leaders, before they could form their first corps, before they could raise armies etc.
P.S.: I expect had the US entered the war earlier bringing their forces to Europe might have been even slower, but that's one aspect of a war that's hard to determine...
Marc aka Caran...