graydingo wrote:Yes, but doesn’t the CSA player receive replacements quicker than the USA player based on the historical fact that the Confederacy placed more importance on filling up existing regiments compared to the Union’s reliance on new regiments in order to take advantage of the higher rate of recruitment this brought, thus continually weakening their experienced units. While the veteran Confederate regiments were receiving newbies that were gradually being folded into their ranks, in effect maintaining their “veteran” status?
Gray Fox wrote:http://www.nellaware.com/blog/civil-war-army-organization-and-order-of-rank.html
This states that CSA Divisions were sometimes twice as large as the Union's. What if we only gave Union Divisions 10 slots? Until CW3, such a house rule might put some new life in the CSA.
Gray Fox wrote:http://www.nellaware.com/blog/civil-war-army-organization-and-order-of-rank.html
This states that CSA Divisions were sometimes twice as large as the Union's.
Blood and Thunder Brigade wrote:Will there be a CW3 though? And if so, when?
DrPostman wrote:Blood and Thunder Brigade wrote:Will there be a CW3 though? And if so, when?
Probably not for a few more years. It will have to appear economically viable for AGEOD.
Blood and Thunder Brigade wrote:DrPostman wrote:Blood and Thunder Brigade wrote:Will there be a CW3 though? And if so, when?
Probably not for a few more years. It will have to appear economically viable for AGEOD.
Does it not currently appear to be so?
coach wrote:And not until people stop buying Civil war II. As long as it’s profitable they won’t interfere. Once it runs its course they’ll give it a year and then use the built up base with a new one.
Bamilus wrote:I have no inside knowledge, but I can't imagine not seeing or at least hearing about a Civil War 3 in development in next few years.
Poorlaggedman wrote:I apologize because I haven't read most of this but if there was a Civil War III I'd highly appreciate a better way to multiplayer than PBEM.
Kriegsspieler wrote:In other ways, I just want to add my voice to others asking the Philippes to put a new version of this game on their to-do list. It's a terrific simulation. Yes it has its bugs and quirks, but it is also immersive and challenging.
Blood and Thunder Brigade wrote:I'm beginning to fear that we may be all zimmer framed before this happens
Kriegsspieler wrote:Blood and Thunder Brigade wrote:I'm beginning to fear that we may be all zimmer framed before this happens
Heh - I'm already halfway there! But I've still got a free hand to move the mouse around, dammit!
Kriegsspieler wrote:Poorlaggedman wrote:I apologize because I haven't read most of this but if there was a Civil War III I'd highly appreciate a better way to multiplayer than PBEM.
This one, at least, appears likely. Pocus posted earlier in this thread that any new game would use the Matrix/Slitherine PBEM++ system. That's a good way to go, as I know from playing Strategic Command with it.
In other ways, I just want to add my voice to others asking the Philippes to put a new version of this game on their to-do list. It's a terrific simulation. Yes it has its bugs and quirks, but it is also immersive and challenging.
Pocus wrote: That's a period AGEOD would like to revisit, but you players need to voice your opinion in the Slitherine forum(s) about what you want to see.
Pocus wrote:That's a period AGEOD would like to revisit, but you players need to voice your opinion in the Slitherine forum(s) about what you want to see.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests