User avatar
ajarnlance
General of the Army
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:40 pm

Interdicting supply on rivers...

Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:27 pm

Can anyone please answer this quick question: in order to stop supply moving along rivers does the button for "land bombardment" need to be ON??
"I can anticipate no greater calamity for the country than the dissolution of the Union... and I am willing to sacrifice everything but honor for its preservation." Robert E. Lee (1807-1870)

Check out my 'To End All Wars' AAR: http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?38262-The-Kaiser-report-the-CP-side-of-the-war-against-Jinx-and-PJL

User avatar
ohms_law
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 725
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:16 pm

I don't know, but I'm fairly certain that it doesn't. My understanding is that you just need the appropriate number of combat elements (naval elements with at least 1 firepower) in the river region.

User avatar
Ace
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:33 pm
Location: Croatia

Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:26 pm

I think land forces need to have bombard on, but I'm not sure.

User avatar
Captain_Orso
Posts: 5766
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:02 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:37 pm

To interdict supply moving through a river region--not across it using the jump-link--at least 1 artillery battery must be able to bombard into that region--if its Bombardment button is not pressed, it cannot bombard--, so "yes", the button must be pressed. Also, if there is a leader in the stack, he must be activated, even if the stack is inside a fort. In both cases the stack may not be in PP.

Also, just to fill-out the information, any unopposed naval[SUP]1)[/SUP] combat unit not in PP in a region--including a river region--will block supply.
Image

User avatar
ajarnlance
General of the Army
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:40 pm

Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:14 pm

Thanks for the info. I didn't realise that a leader needs to be active even inside a fort. Does that mean that in some cases it may be better to have these forces in forts without a leader e.g. so that they can block supply or attack enemy fleets ALL the time?
"I can anticipate no greater calamity for the country than the dissolution of the Union... and I am willing to sacrifice everything but honor for its preservation." Robert E. Lee (1807-1870)



Check out my 'To End All Wars' AAR: http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?38262-The-Kaiser-report-the-CP-side-of-the-war-against-Jinx-and-PJL

User avatar
Captain_Orso
Posts: 5766
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:02 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:21 pm

Just the artillery you want to bombard. It doesn't need a leader anyway.
Image

Return to “Civil War II”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests