I finished up the Marius vs Sulla scenario as Marius and am proud to announce Marius triumphant. However there were quite a few tight moments versus the AI. It took 2 years to stabilize the situation in Italy and Spain. By the third year, it looked like I was riding the wave with hubris and then Sulla returned to Italy with his hammer. Sulla almost finished me off and if I were playing a human, I think I would have been finished. The AI was just not quite capable of taking complete advantage of my mistakes, giving me the breathing room to rehabilitate the tattered remnants of my armies. And that was a mistake--along with Sulla disappearing somewhere. So I recovered in the fourth year and by the fifth had firm control of Italy and dominated Spain. I was even capable of sending a force out to beseige Corinth. Biggest lesson learned in this game is to be very, very, VERY careful about confronting a 6-6-7 leader in battle. Best to avoid him if possible.
I must congratulate the scenario designers and the AI capability. I have played each side in the "4Emperors" scenario and now Marius in "Marius vs Sulla" and each game has been exciting. I don't know that I have played an AI that has performed this well in a stategy game. And so far, each scenario has been challenging regardless of the side I have played. Good play balance with multiple sides can't be an easy task but I am impressed.
I suspect Sulla may be the most powerful force in the Marius vs Sulla scenario, so next I am going to try Mithridites and see how I can do against Sulla. If any one has any strategy hints before I start, now is the time to let me know.