it very simple, add this to diplomacy - negotation (of peace terms).
I got to war with khia via event - and it was ok, i in peace deals get all thier territory (ocupied them long enough), and after certain time I dicovered they still exist in game as empty country - they are on diplomacy sceen, you can deal with them , but they have no land. It is bug or feature ?
and here come improvment to teritory deals - if you get parts of colony to you in peace treaty, then if you go war (again) with same country , then transfer value of colony is lowered by coresponding value of alleady owned teritories.
First of all, annexation exists as a fantasy option in extended claims. Go to the options and select it at your own risk. You can paint the map your own color, as long as it borders to your national regions. But would this be realistic? 
I am not really sure. What you say happens right now to our multiplayer. It is 1858 and as Japan I have commercial agreements with the Koreans and Annamese (Vietnamese). The thing is: both of them don't exist on the map: the Koreans are vassals of the Chinese and the Annamese have been conquered by the French. They still exist, cause their nation is NOT destroyed, albeit subjugated. This is historically accurate. You can't simply eradicate a nation. After all they wait for their moment to be liberated...
I am not really sure. What you say happens right now to our multiplayer. It is 1858 and as Japan I have commercial agreements with the Koreans and Annamese (Vietnamese). The thing is: both of them don't exist on the map: the Koreans are vassals of the Chinese and the Annamese have been conquered by the French. They still exist, cause their nation is NOT destroyed, albeit subjugated. This is historically accurate. You can't simply eradicate a nation. After all they wait for their moment to be liberated...
Care to unify Germany as Austria? Recreate the Holy Roman Empire of the 20th Century:
Großdeutschland Mod
Are you tough enough to impersonate the Shogun and defy the Westerners? Prove it:
Shogun Defiance Mod (completed AAR)
Großdeutschland Mod
Are you tough enough to impersonate the Shogun and defy the Westerners? Prove it:
Shogun Defiance Mod (completed AAR)
-
yellow ribbon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:42 pm
For the annexation i agree, it wouldnt be possible that days. As long revolts and partisans are possible in PON, total annihilation of a culture is not possible.
[color="Red"]for the states it is a problem![/color]
states are scripted by time periods i understood, to ensure the event based character of the game and some alternative outcomes.
maybe i was more easy to run them anyway, than to program a fail-safe-switch getting into action as soon one rewrites history.
unfortunately not only colonies are the problem, that you can waste diplomats thereby, but also this alternative historical states like Texas, Republic of California, Southern German federation...
Diplomatic action should only be possible as long there is a capital.
I mean, this are not the Meos and we are not the CIA, hard to get in touch with someone who had to subdued to "alien" powers.
Not loosing treaties with the people / having relations to them is one thing. A OFFENSIVE diplomatic action AFTER they got overrun shouldnt be possible unless event based
[color="Red"]for the states it is a problem![/color]
states are scripted by time periods i understood, to ensure the event based character of the game and some alternative outcomes.
maybe i was more easy to run them anyway, than to program a fail-safe-switch getting into action as soon one rewrites history.
unfortunately not only colonies are the problem, that you can waste diplomats thereby, but also this alternative historical states like Texas, Republic of California, Southern German federation...
Diplomatic action should only be possible as long there is a capital.
I mean, this are not the Meos and we are not the CIA, hard to get in touch with someone who had to subdued to "alien" powers.
Not loosing treaties with the people / having relations to them is one thing. A OFFENSIVE diplomatic action AFTER they got overrun shouldnt be possible unless event based
...not paid by AGEOD.
however, prone to throw them into disarray.
PS:
‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘
Clausewitz
however, prone to throw them into disarray.
PS:
‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘
Clausewitz
-
yellow ribbon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:42 pm
yes sure, but it would still remain in the optional extended claims mode of PON.
at the moment events/scripted colonies still overrule military seized colonies, you can simply loose them too easy, despite being winning it legally. this wasnt solved satisfactorily, it also works only with extended claims
additionally there is this problem of "i-own-the-structures" but they got back the province and vice versa bug...
but i understand what you are playing at and i am sure the devs do either... even if they are busy
at the moment events/scripted colonies still overrule military seized colonies, you can simply loose them too easy, despite being winning it legally. this wasnt solved satisfactorily, it also works only with extended claims
additionally there is this problem of "i-own-the-structures" but they got back the province and vice versa bug...
but i understand what you are playing at and i am sure the devs do either... even if they are busy
...not paid by AGEOD.
however, prone to throw them into disarray.
PS:
‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘
Clausewitz
however, prone to throw them into disarray.
PS:
‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘
Clausewitz
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests