Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:14 am
Children of slaves became free by law in 1871, the elderly in 1885, and slavery was abolished May 13, 1888 by the abolitionist regent Princess Imperial Isabel, who found grounds to replace the anti-abolitionist ministry with an abolitionist one in order to pass the law while the Emperor was in Europe. The Golden Law was very simple: "From this date, slavery is declared abolished in Brazil." and that anything contrary was revoked. The Emperor had promoted gradual emancipation from the 1860s, including ideas such as compensation for slave owners that could make it politically acceptable. The Golden Law, however, seized the moment and made no provision for the complexities of adjustment to such a dramatic change or the political repercussions.
This was a broadly popular move, except among slave owners and conservatives among the upper class who were not well disposed to the Emperior's liberal views and who turned republican in response -- -favoring the removal of the Emperor as a pro-liberal force.
This can be represented by a large militancy increase among the upper classes, less so in the middle class, and a decrease or neutral effect on militancy down the ladder except for slaves, who would be particularly happy.
Leveraging the disaffection of some elites, in November 1889 there was a coup by military positivists who seized their window of opportunity (before the government repaired the political damage) to establish an authoritarian state under republican guise. The Emperor, misunderstanding the nature of the coup as republican and thus a liberal change, accepted it and ordered no action in opposition. He later regretted his acquiescence.
Slaves should convert into a mix of peasants and workers, maybe based on the ratio in each region.
This could be a decision or an event, or can it be an event-triggered decision?