RGA
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 9:22 am
Location: Britains oldest recorded town.

River crossing penalty

Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:29 am

When attacking Belgrade should there be a penalty (-2 die roll during battle) for crossing a major river when attacking from Zemun(854) and Banat(852) ? Playing the Serbian scenario and didn't see the penalty from Zemun. Looked in the .maps file and the following is the line for Belgrade.

BELGRADE;Belgrade;1048;1049;SER;AT_LandArea;0;TT_Plain;Belgrade;0;1;0;4;PT_NoProduction;HT_NoHarbour;SER;SER;;"{898|?|TT_MajorRiver};{1048|?|TT_MinorRiver}";;;5;"1050;854";;0;;CLT_Continental;0;0;0

The only penalty is if attacking from Vrzac(898) and Pozaverac(1048). Is this right ?

Thanks.

User avatar
calvinus
Posts: 4681
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Italy
Contact: Website

Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:59 am

Yes, it's right. The -2 penalty is applied only during the first (and second?) rounds of combat. You'll find also "very large rivers" that can bring random losses when crossed.

RGA
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 9:22 am
Location: Britains oldest recorded town.

Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:59 pm

So why no penalty when attacking Belgrade from Zemun or Banat which entails crossing a major river ? :confused:

User avatar
calvinus
Posts: 4681
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Italy
Contact: Website

Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:36 am

RGA wrote:So why no penalty when attacking Belgrade from Zemun or Banat which entails crossing a major river ? :confused:


Simply because, as you pointed out, no river boundary is set between Belgrade and Zemun:

BELGRADE;Belgrade;1048;1049;SER;AT_LandArea;0;TT_P lain;Belgrade;0;1;0;4;PT_NoProduction;HT_NoHarbour ;SER;SER;;"{898|?|TT_MajorRiver};{1048|?|TT_MinorRiver}";;;5;"1050;854";;0;;CLT_Continental;0;0;0

That means our scenario editor simply forgot to do it.

Return to “WW1 : La Grande Guerre 14-18”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests