Capture of the generals question

[murat]

In the game is not possible the capture of the generals.
It is more realistic the capture of the generals, and the option about prisoners exchange.
Why the options are not implemented in the game? leure: leure: leure: leure:

[Dragoon!]

Speaking of capturing:
I always thought it'd be a nice touch to add a captured 'eagle' feature..Every time a unit routs in assault/melee, a roll could check to see if the unit had it's standard taken, if so, selected others in it's parent formation could take a morale penalty on, say a rout check, or something in the combat resolution.
I think it'd be a fun 'color' touch to see the number of standards taken in the combat resolution screen.

[Adlertag]

Speaking of capturing:
I always thought it'd be a nice touch to add a captured 'eagle' feature..Every time a unit routs in assault/melee, a roll could check to see if the unit had it's standard taken, if so, selected others in it's parent formation could take a morale penalty on, say a rout check, or something in the combat resolution.
I think it'd be a fun 'color' touch to see the number of standards taken in the combat resolution screen.

Great idea Dragoon! concerning capture of an Eagle, the capturing side may also gain a bunch of VP as a reward, for example.

[Le Tondu]

I like the suggested feature ---in general.

Calling it a captured 'eagle' feature just doesn't sit right as the Allies didn't have Eagles.

I think that it would be more accurate, IMO to call it captured enemy standards -or colors.

Such an action should have a boost in VPs and maybe morale?