jimwinsor wrote:Yeah, and it looks like Louisiana and Texas are not as well railed as the game makes them, either. Hmmm.
This rail to Knoxville from Ky is significant IMO, as it essentially opens up a major invasion route into the south that did not exist historically. Yes Burnside did it, but he had a hell of a time getting there over dirt wagon trails, and massive logistical problems doing it, IIRC.
Stonewall wrote:The problem with the maps posted is that they are not definitive and only cover major lines. There are many many rail lines in existence in 1861 that are NOT included with the maps people are posting.
I've got an 1850 map of Kentucky that suggests a line existed from Lexington to Knoxville. It starts in Knoxville and runs north into Whitley County Kentucky, then does an s-curve northeast into Knox County before turning back northwest back through Whitley county. Then it runs North by Northwest through Laurel and Rock Castle Counties. In Rock Castle at the town of Mt. Vernon, the line turns almost due north into Madison County when at Richmond, it turns north by northwest again straight into Lexington. Then its due north straight to Cincinnatti. Its part of the Charleston and Cincinnatti RR. This is an 1850 map, so anything added after 1850 is not reflected.
Whether this line was suitable for military purposes, I don't know. I suppose my point is that before wholesale changes are made, make sure the information the changes are based upon is completely accurate. So far, the maps posted in this thread are good, but are by no means comprehensive.
jimwinsor wrote:Hmmm, it looks like the rail line was indeed envisioned in 1850, but as this article on one it's tunnels indicates, never built:
http://www.walhallasc.com/stumphouse/history.htm
Franciscus wrote:...But what about winter textures ? They should also be corrected, I think...
Stonewall wrote:I'll be. I wonder why they would put a "planned" railroad on a Congressionally mandated geologic survey as if it already existed? Especially since the map has a key symbol for "planned" road, rail, and canal routes.
Franciscus wrote:If I may add my 2 cents, I would say that major changes (namely the Lexington to Knoxville RR, which existence is an error with potential strategic repercussions, maybe Texas) should be corrected in an official patch. But AGEod should not, in my opinion, strive to be completely accurate in the minor details. It would be a gargantuan task, with many uncertainties - there were in the period after all many unfinished RR (Manassas, anyone ?), and lots of construction, mainly in the North. - and it does not have real importance to possible more than 5% of the players.
The players that wish to engage in this kind of realistic change should do it maybe via a mod.
Good gaming.
Return to “Help to improve AACW!”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests