User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

AACW (public beta) code patch 1.16 (beta 8 update October 12)

Mon May 17, 2010 5:14 pm

Dear players,

Here is the new public beta, code patch for AACW. You are welcome to test and try it.
Knows though that it is not save compatible.

There can be glitches ... or not :neener: so be sure to understand that this is a beta patch and not the official, finalized one!


See post #274 for UPDATE 8

Best regards,
the AGEOD Team.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Mon May 17, 2010 7:54 pm

deleted

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Tue May 18, 2010 7:43 am

It is a comprehensive patch because it is meant to be the official, all-in-one patch when stable. We won't maintain 2 lines of patches, just one, that can patch every versions since 1.00, fully.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Tue May 18, 2010 8:43 am

Until Beta Patch 2, please run the game WITHOUT Battle Animation ON, or the game will make an interface crash (see the checkbox in the Options window, Main Menu)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
caranorn
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Tue May 18, 2010 9:12 am

Will give the patch a try this afternoon...
Marc aka Caran...

User avatar
Bernadotte
Lieutenant
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: south of munich (germany)

Please show Total-Power in Stack-Tooltip

Wed May 19, 2010 8:16 am

Could you please please add a "Total-Power" Line in the Stack-Tooltip like the "Also here:" Line ?!?!!!
That would be great ! :thumbsup:
And please also in WiA and NCP ! :D
It's VERY annoying to totalize all the values by yourself, especially for enemy stacks (s. this thread).

BTW:
Is it WAD that you sometimes don't see the "Also here:" Line when you move over a corps ?

Thank you very much,
Bernadotte

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Wed May 19, 2010 4:32 pm

Not a bad idea, give me some time for that :)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Drakken
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:54 am

Wed May 19, 2010 5:49 pm

Will it stop whole Corps and cavalry units from going in raids far behind enemy lines in the middle of Illinois and Wisconsin without any lines of supply? :D

User avatar
caranorn
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Wed May 19, 2010 5:55 pm

At the start of the July 1861 (w/Kentucky) scenario the Armies in Virginia seem to display the wrong icons (army, not the leader) on map. I tried reforming the army (Confederate) and also to run a turn to see whether it might be corrected next turn. But the problem persisted...
Attachments
AACW_1.16_beta_SS001.png
Marc aka Caran...

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Thu May 20, 2010 9:07 am

This is already fixed, but thanks :)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Hasardeur
Sergeant
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:45 am

Fri May 21, 2010 9:13 am

Hallo,

in the April 61/w Kentucky Szenario some southern brigades seems to be a bit overpowered. For example :

Longstreets Bde : 372 !
Bees Bde : 311
Smiths Bde : 293

Is this WAD ?

Regards

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Fri May 21, 2010 3:11 pm

deleted

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Sat May 22, 2010 7:26 pm

Hi!

Pocus, Gray,
Do you know if the Horse arty bug (it speed up a stack movement) fix is included on this new patch??
I bet it is as Pocus reported it as fixed some time ago, but i don't see it on the readme :bonk:
Cheers!

kingtaso01
Private
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Santiago de León de Caracas, Venezuela

Sat May 22, 2010 10:26 pm

Good evening, fist time posting :)

In my Bull Run Scenario, some Confederate brigades are also extremely overpowered, as Hasardeur pointed out before. In my case they were:

Longstree's Bde.: 594
Cocke's Bde.: 364

Both brigades have 7 elements after fully reinforcing: 4 Inf, 1 Cav, 1 Light Art. and 1 Art.

Now, after looking in-game for the problem I found something quite strange. Some elements in both brigades had some values that were really strange:

Longstreet Bde. Cavalry (3rd Virginia) had:

Experience:566878584/10000 Offensive Fire:508 Defensive Fire: 509
Initiative:510 Discipline:508 Assault:510/510 Cohesion:139/10599
Police:502 Patrol/Evade:510/510

Longstreet Bde. 12lb. Pounder (Middlesex Art) had:

Experience:566878584/10000 Offensive Fire:510 Defensive Fire: 520
Initiative:507 Discipline:505 Assault:507/507 Cohesion:111/10588
Police:500 Patrol/Evade:501/501

Cocke's Bde Cavalry (1st Virginia) had the same values as Longstreet Bde. Cavalry (3rd Virginia), only experience was different: 566467324/10000

This unit are the ones that arrive to complete the 7-element brigade, as when it first appears it normally has 5-elements until it fully reinforces. It seems some elements when they appear get a lot extra experience to the point all values have 500 more points and cohesion has 10500 more points.

I'll keep my eyes open in case I see something like this again. Also, maybe Hasardeur would like to check if the problem he has is similar to mine.

I give you all my best wishes to figure out why does this happen :thumbsup:

Postdata: My main language is not english, in case I wrote something bad.

beatoangelico
Private
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:51 pm

Sat May 22, 2010 11:24 pm

got a crash during the resolution phase of turn 2 of the july 1861 campaign with kentucky. What's the email address to send the files?

User avatar
lodilefty
Posts: 7616
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NY GMT -5 US Eastern

Sun May 23, 2010 12:41 am

beatoangelico wrote:got a crash during the resolution phase of turn 2 of the july 1861 campaign with kentucky. What's the email address to send the files?


support@ageod.com :)
Always ask yourself: "Am I part of the Solution?" If you aren't, then you are part of the Problem!
[CENTER][/CENTER]
[CENTER]Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Rules for new members[/CENTER]
[CENTER]Forum Rules[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Help desk: support@slitherine.co.uk[/CENTER]

GillinghamFC
Conscript
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 9:41 am

Sun May 23, 2010 9:07 pm

kingtaso01 wrote:
In my Bull Run Scenario, some Confederate brigades are also extremely overpowered, as Hasardeur pointed out before. In my case they were:



I also see this problem. I loaded up April 61 Campaign as CSA and played for a few months of peace (I turned the USA AI off). After about 6 months Longstreet's Brigade had a power of 1770

Image

The problem elements were the 1st Virginia Cavalry and the Richmond-Thomas artillery.

Image

As kingtaso01 says the stats for some elements in the brigade are just bizarre.

Its not just a problem of what is reported on the tooltips: the units are overpowered in combat too. I was playing as the USA and lost 50% casualties when attacked in an entrenched position by a force half my size in terms of manpower.
Attachments
1stVirginiaCav.jpg
Longstreet.jpg

beatoangelico
Private
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:51 pm

Sun May 23, 2010 9:48 pm

ok it wasn't just one crash...I got CTDs every time a battle happens. I've tried a clean install and fired up a small scenario but no way, still crashing :( . I didn't play the game much before this week but 1.15 worked fine.

richfed
Posts: 902
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Marion, North Carolina, USA
Contact: Website

Sun May 23, 2010 9:51 pm

Looks pretty serious ... unplayable, maybe?
[color="DarkRed"][SIZE="2"][font="Book Antiqua"]"We've caught them napping!"[/font][/size][/color]

GillinghamFC
Conscript
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 9:41 am

Sun May 23, 2010 10:11 pm

beatoangelico wrote:ok it wasn't just one crash...I got CTDs every time a battle happens. I've tried a clean install and fired up a small scenario but no way, still crashing :( . I didn't play the game much before this week but 1.15 worked fine.


I got CTDs when battle happened, but I found that it stopped crashing if I set the "Battle Animation" option to "Masked".

beatoangelico
Private
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:51 pm

Sun May 23, 2010 10:23 pm

GillinghamFC wrote:I got CTDs when battle happened, but I found that it stopped crashing if I set the "Battle Animation" option to "Masked".


thanks mate, it worked...and now I see that it was already mentioned in this thread :bonk:
I'm feeling quite stupid right now :mdr:

User avatar
caranorn
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Mon May 24, 2010 9:21 am

I noticed that about battles too, just have no clue where that setting is...

Right now I think the patch is indeed unplayable (then again it's a beta and mostly intended for testing) as long as that replacement bug is not taken care of...
Marc aka Caran...

richfed
Posts: 902
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Marion, North Carolina, USA
Contact: Website

Mon May 24, 2010 11:47 am

Yes, I was looking forward to trying it out and seeing what bugs may be present, but, it would seem one can't really play the game with all those super powered beings running around.

I'll try Beta 2 if these things are sorted out.
[color="DarkRed"][SIZE="2"][font="Book Antiqua"]"We've caught them napping!"[/font][/size][/color]

GillinghamFC
Conscript
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 9:41 am

Mon May 24, 2010 4:35 pm

It looks like the Prussians are having problems with overpowered units too.
I see that developers are looking at it already over in RoP forum

http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?t=17681

User avatar
hgilmer
Captain
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 4:05 am

Wed May 26, 2010 1:06 am

When those brigades are fully rested and have more cohesion, their power could go as high as 17,000!!!!

That has happened with me. That is some brigade!

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Wed May 26, 2010 2:44 am

deleted

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Fri May 28, 2010 2:27 pm

Patch updated to beta 2, with several bugs fixed, including weird xp gain bug and several interface glitches.

http://ageoddl.telechargement.fr/temp/patch_AACW_v1.16b2.zip
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

von Sachsen
Captain
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:52 pm

Sun May 30, 2010 12:33 am

Would there be an easy way to make the AI more or less ignore Ft. Pickens and Monroe? While I am marching through Tennesse, Bragg and A.S. Johnston insist on attacking Ft. Pickens with 20,000 troops, virtually ignoring everything else. On a similar note, after my US troops occupied Manasass without resistance, Beauregard headed north straight for Bellefonte, PA in late Sep. 1961 with about 30,000 troops. This is with b2 patch and AI on passive agressivness.

User avatar
Pat "Stonewall" Cleburne
General of the Army
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Kentucky

Sun May 30, 2010 12:43 am

I haven't had any overly aggressive AI yet, but I have noticed that reinforcements build MUCH quicker than before. Even Ironclads build a maximum of 2 turns after you order them. I'm guessing this is because of the new hit recovery rules. Also, it seems like the AI might be changing the leader of the main army back and forth costing them Morale. I've seen it switch between Nathaniel Banks, Ben Butler, and Irvin McDowell a few times already. I'll need to play a little longer to confirm that though.

von Sachsen
Captain
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:52 pm

Sun May 30, 2010 1:57 am

To be fair, it's not the level of agressivness that is the issue, but it's lack of good direction.

Return to “Help to improve AACW!”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests