Fouche wrote: If there isn't maybe there should be...the chance that more militia can automatically be called out in reaction (anger) of the Indians being used by the British.
Let's not suggest changes because we think "maybe there should be." I would like BoA to remain in its historically real context, not turn into an attempt at an "18th Century Wargame Construction Kit."
I don't mean to pick on you, Fouche, but there has been what I consider an alarming trend toward "I'd like to see what if" and "this was stupid historically, let's change it in the game" in the posts of late (see the separate discussion concerning how worthless Louisbourg is and what ought to be done about it in order to improve the French situation). I say that you take the cards you are dealt by the scenario or campaign and see what you can do with them vis-a-vis the victory conditions (which should be designed to present you with the same problem your historical counterpart faced - and I think BoA already does this quite well).
In any event, the biggest problem with calling out more militia is that there were only a few non-indigenous people in those regions to begin with, and many - if not most - of them were Torys. Fielding any rebellion forces at all was a major challenge and a serious draw on the manpower needed to tend the farms and settlements - and, for that matter, to defend them against the forays of small bands and even individual braves not organized into full war parties.