Page 1 of 1

Heintzelman

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:59 pm
by Chris0827
Heintzelman's first name is Samuel not Stuart. The ratings look good but I would either lower his strategic rating or give him the overcautious ability. What success his corps had was because of his good division commanders.

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:40 pm
by marecone
287 USA [color="Red"]Samuel P.[/color] Heintzelman ldr_USA_Heintzelman2 [color="red"]OverCautious Plunderer_Pop[/color] NULL NULL 1 1 2 34 General 1 NULL 3 0 1

Heintzelman was in overall command of the 2nd Michigan Infantry regiment that was responsible for the raid, ransacking, and devastation of the Pohick Church in Lorton, Virginia, on November 12, 1861.

I suggest Plunderer_Pop and second OverCautious

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:58 pm
by Korrigan
Comments?

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:19 pm
by frank7350
seems ok to me

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:58 pm
by Chris0827
marecone wrote:287 USA [color="Red"]Samuel P.[/color] Heintzelman ldr_USA_Heintzelman2 [color="red"]OverCautious Plunderer_Pop[/color] NULL NULL 1 1 2 34 General 1 NULL 3 0 1


I suggest Plunderer_Pop and second OverCautious


I can't see giving plunderer for one incident. Almost every general would have it.

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:50 pm
by Korrigan
287 USA Samuel P. Heintzelman ldr_USA_Heintzelman2 $OverCautious NULL NULL NULL 1 1 2 34 General 1 NULL 3 0 1


What is the rational behind 0 in Attack? (Joe General is 3-1-1)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_P._Heintzelman

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:47 pm
by frank7350
dunno...ask pocus :) i think we can raise him to atleast picketts level...