Page 1 of 1
John Sedgwick
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:13 pm
by rickd79
274 USA John Sedgewick ldr_USA_Sedgewick2 NULL NULL NULL NULL 4 4 2 19 General 1 NULL 4 3 4
299 USA John Sedgewick ldr_USA_Sedgewick NULL NULL NULL NULL 4 4 1 10 General 1 NULL 4 3 4
First of all, it looks like you have John Sedgwick's last name mispelled in the spreadsheet (sorry, I know...minor detail).
Secondly, I would recommend that you consider giving "Uncle John" the "Slow Move" or "Over Cautious" trait as a Corps commander. In one of his few chances to show any agressiveness as a semi-independent commander, durring the Chancellorsville campaign he was slow to get his vastly-superior forces in moticn to attack Jubal Early in front of Fredricksburg.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sedgwick
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:27 pm
by Chris0827
rickd79 wrote:First of all, it looks like you have John Sedgwick's last name mispelled in the spreadsheet (sorry, I know...minor detail).
Secondly, I would recommend that you consider giving "Uncle John" the "Slow Move" or "Over Cautious" trait as a Corps commander. In one of his few chances to show any agressiveness as a semi-independent commander, durring the Chancellorsville campaign he was slow to get his vastly-superior forces in moticn to attack Jubal Early in front of Fredricksburg.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sedgwick
Over cautious probably fits better than slow mover. Other than that he was a solid general. Perhaps you could lower his strategic rating instead of giving him the cautious ability. His other ratings are fine. Perhaps he could get charismatic as well. He was well liked by both his men and his fellow officers.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:46 pm
by Chris0827
I was technically wrong to say McPherson was the highest ranking union officer to be killed. He and Sedgwick were both major generals but Sedgwick's date of rank was earlier. However Sedgwick was a corps commander while McPherson commanded the Army of the Tennessee.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:49 am
by Korrigan
274 USA John Sedgwick ldr_USA_Sedgewick2 $Charismatic $OverCautious NULL NULL 4 4 2 19 General 1 NULL 4 3 4
299 USA John Sedgwick ldr_USA_Sedgewick $Charismatic NULL NULL NULL 4 4 1 10 General 1 NULL 4 3 4
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:03 pm
by Korrigan
New proposition:
274 USA John Sedgwick ldr_USA_Sedgewick2 $Good_Admin_Army $Overcautious NULL NULL 4 4 2 19 General 1 NULL 3 2 2
299 USA John Sedgwick ldr_USA_Sedgewick $Good_Admin_Army $Overcautious NULL NULL 4 4 1 10 General 1 NULL 3 2 2
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:16 pm
by rickd79
Is there any evidence to suggest that Sedgwick was overcautious as a division commander?
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:31 pm
by Chris0827
rickd79 wrote:Is there any evidence to suggest that Sedgwick was overcautious as a division commander?
Not that I am aware of.
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:35 pm
by Korrigan
Fixed
274 USA John Sedgwick ldr_USA_Sedgewick2 $Good_Admin_Army $Overcautious NULL NULL 4 4 2 19 General 1 NULL 3 2 2
299 USA John Sedgwick ldr_USA_Sedgewick $Good_Admin_Army NULL NULL NULL 4 4 1 10 General 1 NULL 3 2 2