AGEOD Forums

Why is it that some CSA divisions are renamed to reflect their commander and some are not?

Longstreet, the Hill's, Ewell, etc always get the division they are attached to renamed. However, some guys like Trimble and the like just get a number. With no faces on their leader pics, sometimes its hard to figure out what division belongs to who at a quick glance.

What is it about some of those leaders that leads to no named divisions? I can't find anything in the date files that is different from one leader to another.

good question. I admit I had been wondering this myself. I don't think it has to do with senority, but maybe it does?

I have never known the CSA to number any of their divsions in historical accounts. I've always seen 'Ewell's Division' or 'Stewart's Division' or whatever.

can you please send me a game with divisions without leaders names?

I certainly can pocus. I will send it right now. just want to make sure the cause of it isn't that the division HQ and the general are both brand new and thus not totally "activated" yet.

wait...do you need the whole 178mb savegame folder? or just the "backup #" folder that is most recent inside that?

for this problem, only the current turn is ok (no backups), and you can zip it also.
thanks.