Bloodier battles and why they are better.
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:56 am
Hello all, I have noticed that in this new patch battles are much, much bloodier. Many have complained about it but I like this, in the current Paradox Mass game (where I am Austria-Hungary) it is October 1914 and casualties are approaching 1.5 million on all sides. In other words, just a little shy of the historical number at this point in the war. I actually see this as an improvement for immersion, even if the retreat mechanics are currently a bit out of whack.
What I would like to see, instead of a reduction in casualties, would be some kind of mobilization regional decision that you could play once a year in the country box. This would give you a massive boost in manpower but would cost NM and/or Rebel alignment. After all, we want the armies and casualties to approach their historical sizes right? Then let us do so. Let the blood flow!
What I would like to see, instead of a reduction in casualties, would be some kind of mobilization regional decision that you could play once a year in the country box. This would give you a massive boost in manpower but would cost NM and/or Rebel alignment. After all, we want the armies and casualties to approach their historical sizes right? Then let us do so. Let the blood flow!