Page 1 of 1
GC61 or BRS 62?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:01 pm
by hanny1
Which in solo play do people prefer? and why.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:10 pm
by Gray Fox
Grand Campaign 61 for me.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:20 pm
by Straight Arrow
The Grand Campaign 61.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:11 pm
by pgr
I tend to play GC 61 out oh habit. That said, as a Union player, I imagine a later start might have benefits, like the eastern armies being under one Army of Northern VA. In the 61 GC JJ and PGT's armies rarely merge, and even after Lee unlocks, you tend to see lots of little armies in VA, who seem to have a hard on for invading the hills of central Penn...
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:47 pm
by ArmChairGeneral
I like 1862 West Campaign, April 61 Grand Campaign, and 1863 Triumph and Defeat. I play as the CSA almost exclusively, but finished my April 61 Union campaign just recently and have played 1862 West as both sides several times. One thing 62 West has to recommend it is that the Far West actually matters to the outcome.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:22 am
by minipol
Grand campaign 61. I bought BRS to fund the development.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:19 am
by grimjaw
I don't play anything other than grand campaign.
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:37 am
by tribeticus
I like the 1861 with the later start because the CSA is more prone to go after Manassas to start the war.