Page 1 of 1
Missing Navy from Mithridites
Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:50 pm
by Jagger2013
I finished playing Sertorious in the Great Mithridites scenario this weekend. As Sertorious, I signed the alliance treaty with Mithridites. I received the 200 denari cash contribution but the navy never showed up. And the only reason I signed the treaty was for the navy. Anybody else have this happen? Any ideas why it never showed up?
Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:06 pm
by Franciscus
Jagger2013 wrote:I finished playing Sertorious in the Great Mithridites scenario this weekend. As Sertorious, I signed the alliance treaty with Mithridites. I received the 200 denari cash contribution but the navy never showed up. And the only reason I signed the treaty was for the navy. Anybody else have this happen? Any ideas why it never showed up?
Hi
The fleet appearance has a probability of 75%, so you may have just been unlucky (designers trying to simulate the sailing risks, etc)
To be sure there is no bug, we would need a save or the scripts of your game.
Regards
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:59 am
by Jagger2013
Ahhh...that explains it. I doubt there is a problem. I probably just had bad luck. Although if no one has ever received the navy, there might be a problem.
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:02 pm
by Revan
Played two games with Sertorius, never see the navy too...
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 10:59 am
by pantsukki
Franciscus wrote:Hi
The fleet appearance has a probability of 75%, so you may have just been unlucky (designers trying to simulate the sailing risks, etc)
To be sure there is no bug, we would need a save or the scripts of your game.
Regards
If there isn't currently one, could an event be added explaining the absence of the fleet to the Sertorian player?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:42 am
by bob.
I've never seen it either... played 2 games, so I guess it's not really representative. I just assumed that "sending a navy" means that Mithridates is allowed to station his fleet in Sertorius territory.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:48 pm
by Revan
If it's true, it's useless. The interest for Sertorius to have a navy is to ease the Gadès, Carthago Nova and Massilia sieges.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 3:16 pm
by Jagger2013
Well there are 5 games without an appearance by a Mithriditic navy for the Sertorious player. That doesn't sound right considering the trigger is suppose to be 75%. Maybe there is a problem.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 3:24 pm
by Jagger2013
Well there are 5 games without an appearance by a Mithriditic navy for the Sertorious player. That doesn't sound right considering the trigger is suppose to be 75%. Maybe there is a problem.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:58 pm
by Bohémond
We really need the ScriptReports to confirm if there is a problem and to fix it if needed.
Thank you
Regards
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:48 pm
by Franciscus
Indeed there was a bug, and master Bohémond found it and fixed it
It will be fixed in patch 1.02b
Regards and thanks for reporting this
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 2:57 pm
by Jagger2013
Great!
And now for the Romans in the Great Mithriditic War. I found a couple odd things playing 1.02a. First, I can't build roman supply wagons. I just built a new roman army to replace one lost in Spain but I can't build supply wagons to go along with them. Which means the army is going to be pretty limited. I assume it is an error but maybe not. Also I received a notification that Caius Cassius Longinus and army was now available for my command and sure enough, there they were in northern Italy. Unfortunately they were locked and as of my last turn, are still locked. Not sure if they are supposed to be locked or not but the message stated they were available for my command.