Page 1 of 1
Replacements
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 1:19 am
by Holy Diver
Hi
I remember there was somewhere here nice chart that explained how many different replacements chits is needed to replace missing hits in a reinforcement pool. Maybe I'm tired now but i don't see it anywhere. And it's not in manual I think
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 1:39 am
by DDLAfan
one chit equals ten hits. so if you have 89 hits, buy 9 chits.
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 3:04 am
by ERISS
I don't think there's better than this in the RusG manual:
"14. (...) Each replacement chit is equivalent in strength to an element of the faction indicated."
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:41 pm
by Holy Diver
I don't think there's better than this in the RusG manual:
"14. (...) Each replacement chit is equivalent in strength to an element of the faction indicated."
But each replacement chit is not equivalnet to those "hits"
one chit equals ten hits. so if you have 89 hits, buy 9 chits.
Yes, I remember this. But this wasn't true for every case, for example one artillery replacement chit was equal 3 hits. At least i think it was like that. But this was also before GOLD version so maybe something has changed
Oh and BTW. I have just made a scan with IObit Malware Fighter and it found a generic troyan in RUS game folder Squall.dll. Is it False Positive?
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:11 am
by ERISS
Holy Diver wrote:BTW. I have just made a scan with IObit Malware Fighter and it found a generic troyan in RUS game folder Squall.dll. Is it False Positive?
My paid AviraAntivirusPro finds absolutely nothing bad for this file.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:13 am
by Philo32b
I always have gone by Bornego's post here:
Who put the stranded Admiral in charge? - Siberian White Short Campaign PBEMSo unless this has changed for RUS Gold, each troop type has a different chit-hit replacement metric. For infantry, for example, I buy one chits to replace 20 hits. Artillery is one chit to replace 8 hits. And so on.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 6:25 am
by Durk
Yes, Bornego was always so clear and correct.