Is Rif War (also known as Second Moroccan War) included in the game?
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:07 pm
Title.
AGEOD Forums
Discussion forum about the wargames Birth of America, AACW, Ageod games and strategy games in general
http://www.ageod-forum.com/
Is Rif War (also known as Second Moroccan War) included in the game?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 8:45 am
In theory no, the war is right after the end game...
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:03 am
Ah yeah, I just realized it. Is there any games that have it though? Is there though for example Philippine Insurgency/Philippine-American War, Taiping and Box Rebellions, Finnish Civil War?
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:02 am
All those mentioned above are in it PON. Rif war is present in EAW / WW1 games. Finish Civil War is a full detailed (and challenging) scenario in RUS gold.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:40 am
EAW? Like what games for example btw? Is it in To End All Wars too?
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:00 pm
Yup
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:33 pm
Hmmm, but I thought that To End All Wars take place from 1914 to 1918. While Rif War (Second Moroccan War) took place from 1920 to 1926.....
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:27 pm
Yes it did, but the EAW game has event(s) which "may" provoke that war earlier...although not certain.
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:34 pm
Aaaah, good, thanks for replies btw! Oh and another thing, does PON and EAW has Foreign Legions including French one? By the way, sorry for so much questions, but do you know, is there 1870's Capture Of Rome in the game? If not, where else I can find it then?
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:19 am
Yes to all. In PON the French has Foreign Legion units (mainly recruitable in Algeria) and there are 2 events about Rome: one about the intervention there by Napoleon III and the second with the Italian seizure in 1870 
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:50 am
Great. And what about French Foreign Legion in EAW (including Rif War event/scenario)? Oh and the last question, just to make sure, is January Uprising in Pride Of Nations (rise of Poland against Russia in 1863)?
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:04 pm
to answer your second question - yes
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 1:57 pm
On the first turn of the campaign game the French corps in Rome gets bumped to nearest French territory, Corsica. I suppose because of a lack of treaty to be on Papal soil. Does the intervention by Napoleon III allow them to come back?
PhilThib wrote:Yes to all. In PON the French has Foreign Legion units (mainly recruitable in Algeria) and there are 2 events about Rome: one about the intervention there by Napoleon III and the second with the Italian seizure in 1870
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 5:11 pm
Yup
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:36 pm
By the way, I forgot, last question, is Moro Rebellion included in the game?
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:18 am
Yes, there are regularly uprisings in the southern Philippines
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 1:23 pm
PhilThib wrote:Yes, there are regularly uprisings in the southern Philippines
WOW. Seems like you guys have put really really a lot of details and research in the game.
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:15 pm
And what about the uprising of the tartars and their invasion of Siberia under Iwan Ogareff and Feofar Khan ?
Is it also included in the game ?
Is it also included in the game ?
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:05 am
Nope, Jules Vernes is only on my bedroom table (or with my Curd Jürgens collection)
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:39 pm
That particular rebellion is the stuff of grade-B movies.
For those unfamiliar with the semi-historical novel Michel Strogoff, here is an excerpt from the Wiki:
quote
While the physical description of Siberia is accurate, the Tartar rebellion described is entirely fictional and rather implausible. Wars with Tartars and Mongols were a major aspect of Medieval Russian history, but the Russians gained the upper hand long before the 19th Century, and no Tartar Khan at the time of writing was in a position to act as Feofar is described as doing; depicting late 19th Century Tartars as able to face Russians on anything resembling equal terms is a manifest anachronism.
unquote
For those unfamiliar with the semi-historical novel Michel Strogoff, here is an excerpt from the Wiki:
quote
While the physical description of Siberia is accurate, the Tartar rebellion described is entirely fictional and rather implausible. Wars with Tartars and Mongols were a major aspect of Medieval Russian history, but the Russians gained the upper hand long before the 19th Century, and no Tartar Khan at the time of writing was in a position to act as Feofar is described as doing; depicting late 19th Century Tartars as able to face Russians on anything resembling equal terms is a manifest anachronism.
unquote