Page 1 of 1
What Hapeend
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:35 am
by Ct11223
Before release of the game there were talks about A ww1 scenario Franco-Prussian war And Grandcampains Starting From 1880 And 1900 Even In The Manual the Screen Shot From The Scenario Lists Had Some Extra Scenarios Including Franco-Prussian War What Happend Shall I wait for Another Patch Or Agold Pack What
Oh How Can I ScreenShots
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:55 am
by PhilThib
The 1870 FPW will come very soon as a DLC....and I am still working on a 1880 and a 1914 campaign
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:24 pm
by Czert
PhilThib wrote:The 1870 FPW will come very soon as a DLC....and I am still working on a 1880 and a 1914 campaign
will be 1880/1914 campaing avaivable via dlc for money
or in patch form ?
.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:03 pm
by PhilThib
Not my call, but most likely DLC
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:00 pm
by Romtos
I'll be buying any DLC in any case. More playable nations added in patches, more scenarios as DLC. It's fine division.
And it's my hope that all that financial support might lead to an actual full-fledged expansion.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:06 pm
by Random
Romtos wrote:I'll be buying any DLC in any case. More playable nations added in patches, more scenarios as DLC. It's fine division.
If this is indeed the business model for PON I am all for it and will show support with my wallet.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:12 pm
by Czert
Romtos wrote:I'll be buying any DLC in any case. More playable nations added in patches, more scenarios as DLC. It's fine division.
If you write this way its sound like good way, but it have little feel of milking to me. I will rather see expansion with more scenarios + improvment to interface/gameplay outside of normal patches.
But mayby it it just me.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:22 pm
by denisonh
Well, a $20 investment upfront is not all that much given the level of support provided, so DLCs seem to be the way to fiscally support continued support for the game.
Czert wrote:If you write this way its sound like good way, but it have little feel of milking to me. I will rather see expansion with more scenarios + improvment to interface/gameplay outside of normal patches.
But mayby it it just me.
What happened?
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:13 pm
by vaalen
denisonh wrote:Well, a $20 investment upfront is not all that much given the level of support provided, so DLCs seem to be the way to fiscally support continued support for the game.
I 'm in. Normally I hate the very concept of DLC, but not for this game, not for Ageod.
I will buy every DLC you put out. Given the extremely low price of PON, it is totally fair.
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:49 pm
by Czert
After more thinking im most probaly (90%) buy DCLs for this game, despite hating DLcs.
After seeing price fod DLC spain-american war, they have fair price for it - comred to other DLCs for other games.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:01 am
by H Gilmer3
Hello folks, this is the old hgilmer3. I had to redo my name and get a new account due to losing the old account and losing the old email address it was registered under.
The low initial price is a way to spread out the revenue streams with DLC. I'll be buying the FPW and the WW1 campaign. Those scenarios were the ones I wanted the game for anyway.